En savoir plus
Did 9/11 revive a North American guns-butter trade-off? Established in the largest administrative overhaul since World War II, the Department of Homeland Security was charged with keeping the United States safe within a wider security community, but confronted the Washington Consensus-based Western Hemisphere free trade movement, beginning with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and extending to the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) in 2003, to materialize a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) compact. Whether 9/11 restrictions impeded these trade-related thrusts or not, embracing neoliberalism permitted Canada and Mexico to pursue their own initiatives, such as proposing free-trade to the US-Canada in 1985, Mexico in 1990, but, as during the Cold War, security imperatives ultimately prevailed.
This work investigates Canada's and Mexico's Department of Homeland Security responses through three bilateral studies of policy responses along comparative lines, case studies of security and intelligence apparatuses in each of the three countries, and a post-9/11 trilateral assessment. Ultimately, they raise a broader and more critical North American question: Will regional economic integration continue to be trumped by security considerations, as during the Cold War era, and thereby elevate second-best outcomes, or rise above the constraints to reassert the unquenchable post-Cold War thirst for unfettered markets replete with private enterprises, liberal policies, and full-fledged competitiveness?
Table des matières
NORTH AMERICAS 9/11 DILEMMA: PUZZLES, PAYOFFS, & THE
INSTITUTIONAL/PROCEDURAL MATRIX
:U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY & POST-9/11 NORTH AMERICAN INTEGRATION
:ASYMMETRY SQUEEZING OUT TRILATERALISM?
MEXICO and HOMELAND SECURITY:REVOLVING DOORS and TRANSIENT
INTERESTS?
CANADA-U.S. RELATIONS SINCE 9/11: PUTTING HUMPTY-DUMPTY BACK
TOGETHER?
POST-9/11 MEXICO-U.S. RELATIONS: GREEN PASTURES, ROUGH PATCHES,
MUDDLED OUTCOMES
CANADA, MEXICO, & HOMELAND SECURITY: ODDBALLS
9/11, THEORY, & THE NORTH AMERICAN IDEA: TRILATERALISM ON TRIAL?
CONCLUSIONS: NORTH AMERICAN TANGO: ONLY FOR TWO
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A propos de l'auteur
Imtiaz Hussain is Professor of International Relations at the Department of International Studies, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City. His research and teaching interests range across the international relations spectrum, as have his publications. Originally from Bangladesh, he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in Political Science, and has been at Universidad Iberoamericana since 1998.
Satya R. Pattnayak is Professor of Sociology and Political Science and Director of Latin American Studies at Villanova University. Most recently, he has authored India as an Emerging Power (India Quarterly, 2007) and
The Return of the State: Globalization, Capital, Coercion and Development (2006).
Anil Hira is cross-appointed with Latin American Studies, and taught at the American University in Cairo and Tulane University before coming to Simon Fraser University. His research interests include international political economy, economic integration, energy deregulation, participatory governance, and fair trade. His geographical focus is on the MERCOSUR countries of South America. He is author of the books
Ideas and Economic Policy in Latin America (1998) and
Political Economy of Energy in the Southern Cone (2003).
