En savoir plus
The book is a unique proposal for an integral description of memory regimes in the South Caucasus region, covering both the independent states of Armenia and Georgia, but also the separatist entities created as a result of the turbulent changes of the early 1990s - Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Being a transdisciplinary proposal, encompassing the perspectives of political science, history and social anthropology, the book may be of interest to researchers from different academic disciplines. At the same time, due to its narrative form, it can also be an interesting proposal for students of eastern studies, allowing for a fuller understanding of the dynamics of political change in the post-Soviet space. The comprehensive and integral approach to the issue of analysing and interpreting collective memory through the prism of its representation, presented in the form of an anthropological story based on case studies, may also be of interest to those not associated with institutional Academia.
Table des matières
Introduction. South Caucasus as a Memory Space.- Chapter I. Structure of the Memory Discourse of Armenia, Georgia, Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh.- Chapter II. History and the Present. Sovietization Of Memory and the Post-Soviet Memory.- Chapter III. Dimensions of the Memory of Armenia, Georgia, Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh.- Chapter IV. Between Institutional Memory and Counter-Memory.
A propos de l'auteur
Bartłomiej Krzysztan is Assistant Professor at the Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.
Résumé
The book is a unique proposal for an integral description of memory regimes in the South Caucasus region, covering both the independent states of Armenia and Georgia, but also the separatist entities created as a result of the turbulent changes of the early 1990s - Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Being a transdisciplinary proposal, encompassing the perspectives of political science, history and social anthropology, the book may be of interest to researchers from different academic disciplines. At the same time, due to its narrative form, it can also be an interesting proposal for students of eastern studies, allowing for a fuller understanding of the dynamics of political change in the post-Soviet space. The comprehensive and integral approach to the issue of analysing and interpreting collective memory through the prism of its representation, presented in the form of an anthropological story based on case studies, may also be of interest to those not associated with institutional Academia.
