En savoir plus
A few years have passed since the Lisbon Treaty came into force but the question still remains of what the Lisbon Treaty has actually brought about. Was it just 'relatively insignificant' as some scholars have claimed, or was it 'something' more? This book sets out to look at this question and it does so by applying a classical division: polity, politics and policy.
Table des matières
Contents: Introduction; Exploring the Lisbon Treaty, Søren Dosenrode; The road to Lisbon, Søren Dosenrode; Assessing the European Union's statehood, Søren Dosenrode; Geographical spillovers, structural power and growing 'agency' post Lisbon, Wolfgang Zank; European security in the Lisbon order, Per Jansson; The reinforcement of fundamental rights in the Lisbon Treaty, Cristina Blasi Casagran; Enhanced cooperation under the Lisbon Treaty, Nico Groenendijk; Designing democratic institutions: legitimacy and the reform of the Council of the European Union in the Lisbon Treaty, Andreas Warntjen; The Spanish presidency - the first presidency under Lisbon Treaty trio (relevant institutional 'acquis' and balance), Blanca Vilà ; Contradictions in the market-creating state in Europe, Lars Niklasson; The Lisbon Treaty - a treaty of polity and politics, Søren Dosenrode; Index.
A propos de l'auteur
Søren Dosenrode is a Professor of International Politics, Jean Monnet Professor of European Studies, and Director of the Centre for Comparative Integration Studies at Aalborg University. He holds an MPhil from the University of Copenhagen, and a DPhil from the University of Zürich. Søren currently heads a research project on indicators for potential regional integration. His latest Ashgate publication was ’The European Union after Lisbon: Polity, Politics, Policy’.
Résumé
A few years have passed since the Lisbon Treaty came into force but the question still remains of what the Lisbon Treaty has actually brought about. Was it just 'relatively insignificant' as some scholars have claimed, or was it 'something' more? This book sets out to look at this question and it does so by applying a classical division: polity, politics and policy.
