En savoir plus
Bringing together international authors to examine how diversity and inclusion impact assessment in higher education, this book provides educators with the knowledge and understanding required to transform practices so that they are more equitable and inclusive of diverse learners.
Table des matières
Introduction. Section 1: Macro contexts of assessment for inclusion: societal and cultural perspectives 1. Promoting equity and social justice through assessment for inclusion 2. Reflections on assessment for social justice and assessment for inclusion 3. Why crip assessment? Critical disability studies theories to advance assessment for inclusion 4. Indigenous perspectives on inclusive assessment: Knowledge, knowing and the relational 5. What can decolonisation of curriculum tell us about inclusive assessment? 6. Inclusive assessment, exclusive academy 7. Ontological assessment decisions in teaching and learning Section 2: Meso contexts of assessment for inclusion: institutional and community perspectives 8. Inclusive assessment: Recognising difference through communities of praxis 9. Inclusive assessment and Australian higher education policy 10. Inclusion, cheating and academic integrity: validity as a goal and a mediating concept 11. Student equity in the age of AI-enabled assessment: Towards a politics of inclusion 12. Opportunities and limitations of accommodations and accessibility in higher education assessment 13. More than assessment task design: promoting equity for students from low socio-economic status backgrounds 14. Assessing employability skills: How are current assessment practices ‘fair’ for international students? Section 3: Micro contexts of assessment for inclusion: educators, students and interpersonal perspectives 15. How do we assess for ‘success’? Challenging assumptions of success in the pursuit of inclusive assessment 16. Inclusive and exclusive assessment: Exploring the experiences of mature-aged students in regional and remote Australia 17. Normalising alternative assessment approaches for inclusion 18. Student choice of assessment methods: How can this approach become more mainstream and equitable? 19. "How to look at it differently": negotiating more inclusive assessment design with student partners 20. Addressing inequity: Students’ recommendations on how to make assessment more inclusive End Section Moving forward: mainstreaming assessment for inclusion in curricula
A propos de l'auteur
Rola Ajjawi is Professor Education Research at the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Australia where she has led an extensive program of research into student failure and success, with particular interest in equity, feedback and learning cultures.
Joanna Tai is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University Australia. She researches student experiences of learning and assessment from university to the workplace, including feedback and assessment literacy, evaluative judgement and peer learning.
David Boud is Alfred Deakin Professor and Foundation Director of the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning at Deakin University, Australia. He is also Emeritus Professor at the University of Technology Sydney and Professor of Work and Learning at Middlesex University. His current work is in the areas of assessment for learning in higher education, academic formation and workplace learning.
Trina Jorre de St Jorre is Honorary Fellow at the Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, and Student Experience Portfolio Manager at University of New England. Her research and practice is focused on continual improvement of the student experience, with particular interest in graduate employability and student achievement.
Résumé
Bringing together international authors to examine how diversity and inclusion impact assessment in higher education, this book provides educators with the knowledge and understanding required to transform practices so that they are more equitable and inclusive of diverse learners.
