Fr. 50.90

Science and Judicial Reasoning - The Legitimacy of International Environmental Adjudication

Anglais · Livre de poche

Expédition généralement dans un délai de 3 à 5 semaines

Description

En savoir plus










Examining how judges evaluate scientific knowledge when framing disputes, hearing evidence, conducting causal inquiry, and setting the standard of review, Sulyok provides a comparative analysis of environmental case-law across major international courts. This work also suggests reasoning styles with which judges can legitimately justify decisions.

Table des matières










Part I. The Three-Fold Challenge of Engaging with Science in International Environmental Adjudication: 1. Introduction to a comparative study on judicial engagement with science; 2. The rules of judicial engagement with science: a three-fold challenge; Part II. Techniques for Judicial Engagement with Science in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals: 3. Judicial engagement with science in the environmental case-law of the international court of justice; 4. Science in the practice of inter-state arbitral tribunals; 5. Science in the environmental jurisprudence of regional human rights courts; 6. Scientific claims before the WTO; 7. Science in the practice of investment arbitral tribunals; 8. Science appears before the international tribunal for the law of the sea; Part III. Engaging with Scientific Knowledge in the Judicial Reasoning: 9. Trends in judicial engagement with science: a comparative assessment; 10. Science and the legitimacy of judicial reasoning; 11. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index.

A propos de l'auteur

Katalin Sulyok is Lecturer, Department of International Law, ELTE Law School, Budapest.

Résumé

Examining how judges evaluate scientific knowledge when framing disputes, hearing evidence, conducting causal inquiry, and setting the standard of review, Sulyok provides a comparative analysis of environmental case-law across major international courts. This work also suggests reasoning styles with which judges can legitimately justify decisions.

Préface

This pioneering study on environmental case-law examines how courts engage with science and reviews legitimate styles of judicial reasoning.

Commentaires des clients

Aucune analyse n'a été rédigée sur cet article pour le moment. Sois le premier à donner ton avis et aide les autres utilisateurs à prendre leur décision d'achat.

Écris un commentaire

Super ou nul ? Donne ton propre avis.

Pour les messages à CeDe.ch, veuillez utiliser le formulaire de contact.

Il faut impérativement remplir les champs de saisie marqués d'une *.

En soumettant ce formulaire, tu acceptes notre déclaration de protection des données.