En savoir plus
This book explores the IMF's role within the politics of austerity by providing a path-breaking comprehensive analysis of how the IMF approach to fiscal policy has evolved since 2008, and how the IMF worked to alter advanced economy policy responses to the global financial crisis (GFC) and the Eurozone crisis. It updates and refines our understanding of how the IMF seeks to wield ideational power by analysing the Fund's post-crash their ability to influence what
constitutes legitimate knowledge, and their ability fix meanings attached to economic policies within the social process of constructing economic orthodoxy.This book is interested in the politics of economic ideas, focused on the assumptive foundations of different approaches to economic policy, and how
the interpretive framework through which authoritative voices evaluate economic policy is an important site of power in world politics. After establishing the internal conditions of possibility for new fiscal policy thinking to emerge and prevail, detailed case studies of IMF interactions with the UK and French governments during the Great Recession drill down into how Fund seeks to shape the policy possibilities of advanced economy policy-makers and account for the scope and limits of Fund
influence. The Fund's reputation as a technocratic, scientific source of economic policy wisdom is important to for its intellectual authority. Yet, as this book demonstrates, the Fund makes normatively driven interventions in ideologically charged economic policy debates. The analysis reveals the
malleability of conventional wisdoms about economic policy, and the processes of their social construction.
Table des matières
- 1: The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis
- 2: Ideational Change at the IMF after the Crash
- 3: IMF, Economic Schools of Thought, and Their Normative Underpinnings
- 4: Analysing the IMF Surveillance of Advanced Economies: The Social Construction of Fiscal Space
- 5: The Fund's Fiscal Policy Views and the Politics of Austerity
- 6: The IMF, the UK Policy Debate, and Debt and Deficit Discourse
- 7: The IMF and the French Fiscal Rectitude amidst the Eurozone Crisis
- Conclusion - IMF Intellectual Authority and the Politics of Economic Ideas After the Crash
A propos de l'auteur
Ben Clift is Professor of Political Economy at the University of Warwick. His research interests lie at the interface of comparative and international political economy. He is author of Comparative Political Economy: States, Markets and Global Capitalism (Palgrave, 2014), French Socialism in a Global Era (Continuum, 2003), and co-editor of Economic Patriotism: Political Intervention in Open Markets (Routledge, 2012) and Where Are National Capitalisms Now? (Palgrave 2004). He has published widely on the politics of economic ideas, the IMF, French and comparative capitalisms, the political economy of social democracy, and French and British politics in journals including British Journal of Political Science, Journal of Common Market Studies, Journal of European Public Policy, Review of International Political Economy, and New Political Economy.
Résumé
This book analyses the IMF's role as arbiter of legitimate economic policy since the 2008 crash, and during aftershocks of the Eurozone crisis.
Texte suppl.
This theoretically and empirically rich book challenges those who see the IMF always as an ideologically rigid enforcer of fiscal austerity. In analyzing the Fund's less orthodox positions in post-2008 debates about fiscal policy in the European context, Clift develops a fascinating analysis that should be read by all those interested in the politics of economic ideas, the ideational significance of international organizations, and global financial governance after the 2008 financial crash.
Commentaire
That economic ideas are the currency of power in the corridors of the IMF is well known. But how these ideas are developed, shared, and spread is largely assumed. Ben Clift's excellent book changes that. By leveraging constructivist insights on how actors frame problems to a framework that stresses processes of ideational reconciliation and recognition within the fund, Clift shows the IMF to be more ideationally pluralist, and yet more political, than most analysts have shown to date. Mark Blyth, Eastman Professor of Political Economy, The Watson Institute for International Affairs, Brown University.
