En savoir plus
Zusatztext Helm's caustic analysis finds contradictions at the heart of Britain's energy policy under the present and previous governments. Informationen zum Autor Dieter Helm is Official Fellow in Economics at new College, Oxford. He has been a member of the Department of Trade and Industry's Energy Advisory Panel since 1993 and is also Chairman of the Academic Panel of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. He is a director of Oxford Economic Research Associates Ltd (OXERA) and has advised governments, regulators and major companies in the UK and internationally. Klappentext The transformation of Britain's energy policy in the last two decades has been more radical than any such change in developed economies. Since 1979 the great state energy monopolies created after the Second World War have been privatised and made subject to competition. Images of Arthur Scargill and the miners' strike of the 1980s remain vivid, but what effect has the new market philosophy had on Britain's energy industries? Since 1979 the National Coal Board, British Gas and the Central Electricity Generating Board have all been broken up. Energy trading, electricity pools, auctions and futures markets first developed, but they failed to solve the old energy policy problems of security of supply and network integrity, and the new ones of the environment and reliance on gas. The government introduced a new regulatory regime as a temporary necessity but regulation did not wither away, rather it grew to be more pervasive. Changing the ownership of the industries did not reduce the government's involvement, it simply changed its form. The 1980s and 1990s were years of energy surpluses and low fossil-fuel prices. There was little need to invest, and much of the investment in the so-called dash for gas was artificially stimulated. The new owners sweated the assets, and engaged in major financial engineering. Takeovers consolidated the industry into a smaller number of dominant firms. As investment priorities became more urgent, with the environmental pressures of climate change and the gradual switch to imported gas, the market philosophy was found wanting. Energy policy could not rely solely on the market. And it is the government which finds itself responsible for resolving the core issues of energy policy. Helm's book tells this story. It is a major study of the new market approach to energy policy in Britain since 1979. It describes the miners' strike, the privatisations of the gas, electricity, nuclear generation, and coal industries, and looks at events such as the dash for gas, regulatory failures in setting monopoly prices, and the takeovers and the consolidations of the late 1990s. Helm sets out the achievements of the new market philosophy, but also analyses why it has ultimately failed to turn energy industries into normal commodity businesses. Zusammenfassung Offering a survey of British energy policy since 1979, this book blends economic analysis with political and historical narrative. It traces the way in which political pressures from the proponents of both nationalization and privatization, as well as environmentalists, have affected the development of an industry. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1: Introduction 2: The Inheritance: State Ownership, Monopoly, and Planning 3: First Steps Towards the Market Philosophy 4: Thatcher and Scargill: Getting Off the Labour Standard 5: The Nuclear Option in the 1980s: Security of Supply and National Energy Independence 6: Missed Opportunity: British Gas Privatization 7: Electricity Privatization 8: The Transition to Competition in the Electricity Industry 9: Preparing for the End of British Coal: Privatization and Decline 10: Nuclear Privatization and the End of the Nuclear Dream 11: Regulatory Failure and Financial Engineering: The RECs' First Review 12: Takeover Mania and Capita...
