Mehr lesen
The most important debate in Islamic origins is that of the reliability of the lists of transmitters (isnads) that are said to guarantee the authenticity of the materials to which they are attached. Many scholars have come to the conclusion that most traditions (hadiths), which claim to preserve the words and deeds of Muhammad and early Muslim scholars, are spurious. Other scholars defend hadiths and their isnads, arguing for an early continuous written transmission of these materials. The first purpose of this study is to summarize and critique the major positions on the issue of the authenticity of hadiths in general and exegetical hadiths in particular. The second purpose is to devise a means of evaluating isnads that does not rely on circular arguments and to use it to determine if the hadiths in the Tafsir of al-Tabari, attributed to Ibn 'Abbas, are genuine.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Acknowledgements, 1 INTRODUCTION, 2 ?AD?TH CRITICISM, 3 EXEGETICAL ?AD?THS AND THE ORIGINS OF TAFS?R, 4 METHODOLOGY: ISN?DS AND EXEGETICAL DEVICES, 5 DATA AND ANALYSIS: THE AUTHENTICITY OF IBN CABB?S'S ?AD?THS IN AL-?ABAR?'S TAFS?R, 6 CONCLUSIONS, Bibliography, Index
Über den Autor / die Autorin
Herbert Berg
Zusammenfassung
This text summarises and critiques the major positions on the issue of the authenticity of traditions (hadiths) which claim to preserve the words and deeds of Muhammad and early Muslim scholars in general and exegetical hadiths in particular.
