Mehr lesen
Based on the anthropocentric assumptions of the classical notions of subjective law, theoretical discussions about animal rights are also developed, sometimes framing them as true subjects of law, sometimes placing them as object of the legal relationship, but always starting from essentialist and/or ontological premises, which produce paradoxes and paralyze science. I understand that attempts to frame animal law in the classic and dichotomous distinction "subject versus object" runs into some practical and theoretical problems, which I intended to address in my master's research, proposing as "comfortable" contribution to this discussion the theory of Luhmann's autopoietic communicative systems, which allows the replacement of the subject of law as an entity, as a concrete person, by the idea of communication.
Über den Autor / die Autorin
Chiara Ramos. PhD candidate in Public Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon, with co-tutorship at the University of Rome/La Sapienza. Graduated and Master of Laws from the Federal University of Pernambuco. Federal Attorney. Director of the School of the General Advocacy of the Union. Editor-in-Chief of the AGU Magazine. University Professor.
