Mehr lesen
This book defends the value of democratic participation. It aims to improve citizens' democratic control and vindicate the value of citizens' participation against conceptions that threaten to undermine it.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Introduction: Democracy for Us, Citizens
- I - Why Deliberative Democracy?
- 1: The Democratic Ideal of Self-government
- 2: Pluralist Conceptions of Democracy
- II - Why Participatory Deliberative Democracy?
- 3: Purely Epistemic Conceptions of Democracy
- 4: Lottocratic Conceptions of Deliberative Democracy
- 5: Lottocratic Institutions from a Participatory Perspective
- 6: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy: Against Shortcuts
- III - A Participatory Conception of Public Reason
- 7: Can Public Reason Be Inclusive?
- 8: Citizens in Robes
Über den Autor / die Autorin
Cristina Lafont is Harold H. and Virginia Anderson Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University, where she is Chair of the philosophy department and Director of the Program in Critical Theory. She is the author of Global Governance and Human Rights (Amsterdam, 2012), Heidegger, Language, and World-disclosure (Cambridge, 2000), The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy (MIT, 1999), and co-editor of Critical Theory in Critical Times: Transforming the Global Political and Economic Order (Columbia, 2017) and the Habermas Handbook (Columbia, 2017). She received her Ph.D. in 1992 from the University of Frankfurt. In 2011 she held the Spinoza Chair at the University of Amsterdam and in 2012/13 she was Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Berlin. She was recently awarded the 2022 Dr. Martin R. Lebowitz and Eve Lewellis Lebowitz Prize for Philosophical Achievement and Contribution by The American Philosophical Association and the Phi Beta Kappa Society.
Zusammenfassung
This book defends the value of democratic participation. It aims to improve citizens' democratic control and vindicate the value of citizens' participation against conceptions that threaten to undermine it.
Zusatztext
This book makes a significant contribution to the literature defending a broadly deliberative view of democracy ... In the course of her defense she shows that judicial review need not be opposed to participatory deliberative democracy.
