Mehr lesen
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Introduction: Literature and Speech Acts from Austin to Derrida to Butler
1. Literature as Parasite: Austin Excludes Poetry as a Parasite of Speech Acts
Ad 1: Austin’s Poetry in Dead Poets Society
2. Parasite as Necessary Possibility: Derrida Elevates the Parasite as the Poetry of Speech Acts
Ad 2: Derrida’s Parasite in Romeo and Juliet
3. Necessary Possibility as Necessary Actuality: Butler Finds Poetry in Every Parasite
Ad 3: Butler’s Poetry of Parasites in We Are all Jews and Germans
Conclusion: Literature and Political Disagreement from Austin to Rancière to Ducrot
Über den Autor / die Autorin
Jernej Habjan is Research Fellow at the Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU), Ljubljana, and Assistant Professor at the Postgraduate School ZRC SAZU, Slovenia. He is the co-editor of Globalizing Literary Genres (2016), Academic Labour, Unemployment and Global Higher Education (2016) and (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy (2014).
Zusammenfassung
The first extended Lacanian reading of J. L. Austin’s ordinary language philosophy, this book examines how it has been received in the continental tradition by Jacques Derrida and Judith Butler, Jacques Rancière and Oswald Ducrot. This is a tradition that neglects Austin’s general speech act theory on behalf of his special theory of the performative, whilst bringing a new attention to the literary and the aesthetic.
The book charts each of these theoretical interactions with a Lacanian reading of the thinker through a case study. Austin, Derrida and Butler are respectively read with a Hollywood blockbuster, a Shakespearean bestseller and a globally influential May ’68 poster – texts preoccupied with the problem of subjectivity in early, high and postmodernity. Hence Austin’s constatives (nonperformative statements) are explored with Dead Poets Society; Derridean naming with Romeo and Juliet; and Butlerian aesthetic re-enactment with We Are all German Jews. Finally, Rancière and Ducrot enable a return to Austin beyond his continental reception. Austin is valorised with a theory as attractive, and as irreducible, to the continental tradition as his own thought, namely Jacques Lacan’s theory of the signifier.
Drawing together some of the giants of language theory, psychoanalysis and poststructuralist thought, Habjan offers a new materialist reading of the ‘ordinary’ status of literary language and a vital contribution to current debates within literary studies and contemporary philosophy.
Vorwort
Arguing that literature is grounded in ordinary language, this book offers a radical new interrogation of literature as political institution and provides a new model for a philosophy of literary reading.
Zusatztext
Jernej Habjan’s Lacanian interpretation of speech act theory is an important intervention into the continental reception of the work of Austin and Searle, and of ordinary language philosophy more generally. Habjan’s analysis of “etiolated” (i.e., non-pragmatic) speech acts, such as literary writing, is an erudite and incisive reframing of post-structuralist approaches to literature. He successfully brings the social context back into the discussion in a critical way while highlighting the effect of subjectivation that happens with speech acts. His discussion of Derrida and Butler then takes shape as an appropriative critique that develops and extends the deconstructive analysis of Austin and Searle, but at the same time argues against their neglect of subjectivity. It is also accessibly written and clearly structured.
