Mehr lesen
Zusatztext A scholarly! informative and heartfelt work with no letdowns. Informationen zum Autor Helen Stalford is Professor of Law and Director of the European Children's Rights Unit at the School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool. Kathryn Hollingsworth is Professor of Law at Newcastle Law School. Stephen Gilmore is a Senior Lecturer in Law at King's College London, UK. Zusammenfassung This important edited collection is the culmination of research undertaken by the Children’s Rights Judgments Project. This initiative involved academic experts revisiting existing case law, drawn from a range of legal sub-disciplines and jurisdictions, and redrafting the judgment from a children’s rights perspective. The rewritten judgments shed light on the conceptual and practical challenges of securing children’s rights within judicial decision-making and explore how developments in theory and practice can inform and (re-)invigorate the legal protection of children’s rights. Collectively, the judgments point to five key factors that support a children’s rights-based approach to judgment writing. These include: using children’s rights law and principles; drawing on academic insights and evidence; endorsing child friendly procedures; adopting a children's rights focused narrative; and using child-friendly language. Each judgment is accompanied by a commentary explaining the historical and legal context of the original case and the rationale underpinning the revised judgment including the particular children’s rights perspective adopted; the extent to which it addresses the children’s rights deficiencies evident in the original judgment; and the potential impact the alternative version might have had on law, policy or practice. Presented thematically, with contributions from leading scholars in the field, this innovative collection offers a truly new and unique perspective on children’s rights. Inhaltsverzeichnis Part I: Children’s Rights Judgments: From Academic Vision to New Practice 1. Introducing Children’s Rights Judgments Helen Stalford, Kathryn Hollingsworth and Stephen Gilmore 2. Judging Children’s Rights: Tendencies, Tensions, Constraints and Opportunities Helen Stalford and Kathryn Hollingsworth 3. Towards Children’s Rights Judgments Kathryn Hollingsworth and Helen Stalford Part II: Children’s Rights and Family Life 4. Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam) Commentary: Emma Walmsley Judgment: Jo Bridgeman 5. Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECR I-000 18 March 2014 Commentary: Connie Healy Judgment: Eugenia Caracciolo di Torella 6. Re C v XYZ County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1206 Commentary: Brian Sloan Judgment: Claire Fenton-Glynn 7. Gas and Dubois v France (Application no. 25951/07) ECtHR 15 March 2012 Commentary: Ursula Kilkelly Judgment: Lydia Bracken 8. P-S (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 223 Commentary: David Lane Judgment: Jane Williams 9. Hoge Raad ECLI:NL:HR:2014:3535 5 December 2014 Commentary: Ton Liefaard and Marielle Bruning Judgment: Ton Liefaard and Marielle Bruning 10. AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 554 Commentary: Thomas DC Bennett Judgment: Kirsty Hughes Part III: Children’s Rights and Medical Decision-making 11. Re W (A Minor)(Consent to Medical Treatment) [1993] Fam 64 Commentary: Emma Nottingham Judgment: Stephen Gilmore 12. F v F [2013] EWHC 2683 (Fam) Commentary: Julie Doughty Judgment: Emma Cave 13. Re T (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1997] 1 FLR 502 Commentary: Noam Peleg Judgment: Michael Freeman 14. Re A (Conjoined Twins) [2000] EWCA Civ 254 Commentary: Jonathan Herring Judgment: Amel Alghrani Part IV: Childr...
