Mehr lesen
Zusatztext There are several reasons why this edited volume is a highly recommended contribution. Firstly, it includes chapters written by a select group of contributors - experts in their areas of research and work - who discuss several aspects of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion. Among them there are lawyers, academics and counsels to international courts and tribunals. In addition, the book advances an interdisciplinary perspective which enables a more comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand. Indeed the originality of this volume lies precisely in the significance it places in the development of a better understanding of the complex relationship between law and politics. . . Overall, the book is highly recommended for scholars and researchers interested in Kosovo's status and in the normalisation of its relations with Serbia, as well as for scholars working on other cases of contested statehood and on issues of secession and recognition. Informationen zum Autor Marko Milanovic is Associate Professor at the University of Nottingham School of Law, as well as Vice-President of the European Society of International Law. His first book, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy, was published by OUP in 2011.Sir Michael Wood, KCMG, is a member of the United Nations International Law Commission, and a Senior Fellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge. He was Legal Adviser to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office between 1999 and 2006. He is the author of, inter alia, The International Law Commission 1999-2009 (with Arnold Pronto). Klappentext The International Court of Justice controversially found in 2010 that the Kosovo declaration of independence did not violate international law. This book assesses its context and legacy, investigating if this judgement was unique to Kosovo, or if it set a precedent. Zusammenfassung The International Court of Justice controversially found in 2010 that the Kosovo declaration of independence did not violate international law. This book assesses its context and legacy, investigating if this judgement was unique to Kosovo, or if it set a precedent. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1: Editors' Introduction (Marko Milanovi¿ and Michael Wood) Part I: The Advisory Proceedings in Context 2: Explaining Serbia's Decision to Go to the ICJ (James Ker-Lindsay) 3: Arguing the ^ Kosovo ^ Case (Marko Milanovi¿) 4: The Practicalities of Representing a Client in Complex Multiparty Proceedings: The Example of Kosovo (Qudsi Rasheed and Michael Wood) 5: The Settling of a Self-Determination Conflict? Kosovo's Status Process and the 2010 Advisory Opinion of the ICJ (Bernhard Knoll-Tudor) Part II: The Opinion 6: Questions of Jurisdiction and the Discretion to Decline a Request for an Advisory Opinion (Vladimir Djeri¿) 7: The Question Question (Daniel Müller) 8: Reflections on the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: Interpreting Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) (Sean Murphy) 9: The UN Secretary-General and the Advisory Opinion (Mathias Forteau) 10: The Sounds of Silence: Making Sense of the Supposed Gaps in the Kosovo Opinion (Marc Weller) Part III: Reactions and Implications 11: The Court and its Multiple Constituencies: Three Perspectives on the Kosovo Advisory Opinion (André Nollkaemper) 12: The Political Aftermath of the ICJ's ^ Kosovo pinion (Tatjana Papi¿) 13: Kosovo - The Questions Not Asked: Self-Determination, Secession, and Recognition (Alain Pellet) 14: Kosovo and the Criteria for Statehood in International Law (James Crawford) 15: Has the Advisory Opinion's Finding that Kosovo's Declaration of Independence was not Contrary to International Law Set an Unfortunate Precedent? (Anne Peters) Part IV: The Road Ahead 16: Some Implications of the Advisory Opinion for Resolution of the Serbia-Kosovo Conflict (Richard Capla...
