Ulteriori informazioni
This book sheds light on metrics as a key element of power relations in the EU anti-poverty policy, not least because the calculative infrastructure underlying them actively shapes the distribution of power. These metric-based power dynamics are linked to the fundamental lines of division in the EU, namely the tension between the vested interests of Member States and of supranational bodies, as well as between economic and social policy objectives. The analysis also points to the blurring of the boundaries between the technical and political (interest-based) aspects of the policy-making process. Actors are surprisingly often not only aware of, but openly talk about, the normative choices and negotiations involved in creating indicators and the trade-off between cognitive value and alignment of interests. Many also believe that it is better to use “imperfect” but “commonly agreed” indicators than none at all. By unpacking these hidden infrastructures and everyday practices, this book brings a new perspective to the study of EU policy-making. Drawing on extensive empirical research, it provides a robust empirical account of how Europe governs through numbers.
Marianna Zieleńska is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Sociology, University of Warsaw. She researches quantification in public policy, including the use of quantitative measures and algorithms in labour market and anti-poverty policy. Between 2021 and 2025, she led two projects focusing on poverty indicators applied in European Union anti-poverty policy that resulted in this book: "Making anti-poverty policy in the European Union through quantitative measures - the case study of the composite indicator at risk of poverty or social exclusion” (financed by the National Science Centre) and “What gets measured gets done - governing the EU anti-poverty policy though indicators” (financed by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange) - carried out during visiting fellowship at the University of Edinburgh (School of Social and Political Science).
Sommario
Introduction: Calculative infrastructure and ideational power games.- Chapter 1: Mapping the theoretical field – EU indicators in different theoretical perspectives.- Chapter 2: EU anti-poverty policy and the proliferation of metrics.- Chapter 3: Harmonization of data – installing the calculative infrastructure.- Chapter 4: Negotiating policy priorities though numbers.- Chapter 5: The monitoring role of calculative infrastructure.- Chapter 6: Communicating positions and advancing interests though calculative infrastructure.- Chapter 7: Legitimising the supranational dimension of the EU though indicators.- Conclusions: The technical and the political as a part of the calculative infrastructure.
Info autore
Marianna Zieleńska is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Sociology, University of Warsaw. She researches quantification in public policy, including the use of quantitative measures and algorithms in labour market and anti-poverty policy. Between 2021 and 2025, she led two projects focusing on poverty indicators applied in European Union anti-poverty policy that resulted in this book: "Making anti-poverty policy in the European Union through quantitative measures - the case study of the composite indicator at risk of poverty or social exclusion” (financed by the National Science Centre) and “What gets measured gets done - governing the EU anti-poverty policy though indicators” (financed by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange) - carried out during visiting fellowship at the University of Edinburgh (School of Social and Political Science).
Riassunto
This book sheds light on metrics as a key element of power relations in the EU anti-poverty policy, not least because the calculative infrastructure underlying them actively shapes the distribution of power. These metric-based power dynamics are linked to the fundamental lines of division in the EU, namely the tension between the vested interests of Member States and of supranational bodies, as well as between economic and social policy objectives. The analysis also points to the blurring of the boundaries between the technical and political (interest-based) aspects of the policy-making process. Actors are surprisingly often not only aware of, but openly talk about, the normative choices and negotiations involved in creating indicators and the trade-off between cognitive value and alignment of interests. Many also believe that it is better to use “imperfect” but “commonly agreed” indicators than none at all. By unpacking these hidden infrastructures and everyday practices, this book brings a new perspective to the study of EU policy-making. Drawing on extensive empirical research, it provides a robust empirical account of how Europe governs through numbers.
