Fr. 32.90

Haves and Have Nots in Supreme Court Representation and - Participation, 2016 to 202

Inglese · Tascabile

Spedizione di solito entro 3 a 5 settimane

Descrizione

Ulteriori informazioni










Courts are often thought of as protectors of minority rights. What happens when the composition of courts changes such that politically disadvantaged groups expect a less favorable reception? This Element examines whether the increasing conservatism of the US Supreme Court during Donald Trump's presidency changed the behavior of litigants and amicus curiae. The authors test whether membership changes led to reduced filings by individuals and organizations representing marginalized groups and increased filings by businesses and conservative states and interest groups. The authors find substantial reductions in participation by the most politically disadvantaged and substantial increases in participation by the most conservative groups.

Sommario

1. Introduction: supreme court membership change and its consequences; 2. Changes in petitioner behavior; 3. Changes in amicus behavior; 4. Elections have consequences: looking beyond trump's justices; References.

Riassunto

This Element examines whether the increasing conservatism of the US Supreme Court during Donald Trump's presidency changed the behavior of litigants and amicus curiae. The authors find substantial reductions in participation by the most politically disadvantaged and substantial increases in participation by the most conservative groups.

Prefazione

This Element shows that elections matter, as seen in the impact of Trump's Supreme Court appointments.

Recensioni dei clienti

Per questo articolo non c'è ancora nessuna recensione. Scrivi la prima recensione e aiuta gli altri utenti a scegliere.

Scrivi una recensione

Top o flop? Scrivi la tua recensione.

Per i messaggi a CeDe.ch si prega di utilizzare il modulo di contatto.

I campi contrassegnati da * sono obbligatori.

Inviando questo modulo si accetta la nostra dichiarazione protezione dati.