Ulteriori informazioni
Planning is undergoing a period of profound change and risks losing meaning and authority by becoming merely a tool for financial speculation and generating capital. Planning and Citizenship seeks to rediscover planning's technical and theoretical roots by reconstructing the memory of planning through the lens of the changing relationship between planning and citizenship.
Tracing the historical relationship between planning and citizenship through a single thread, Luigi Mazza employs three ancient models - those of Hippodamus, Romulus, and Ancient China - to understand the foundations of spatial governance and citizenship. Paying particular attention to classic case studies of American cities, this book moves through the development of central planning theories by key thinkers like Geddes, Cerdà, Howard, Abercrombie and Lefebre. Analysing the role of government in promoting social citizenship and symbolic values through planning, Mazza takes into account the changing role of government in planning, including concepts of neoliberalism and the minimal State.
Providing critical debate over the current role of spatial governance in planning and citizenship, Planning and Citizenship offers a unique historical analysis of a crucial topic in planning.
Sommario
Introduction 1. Three archetypes of spatial governance 2. Forms of citizenship and the ordering of space: a brief overview 3. Three American cases 4. British Idealism and Patrick Geddes 5. Social Citizenship 6. Cerdà, Howard, Abercrombie 7. A new form of citizenship: the "right to the city" 8. The decline of citizenship and spatial governance
Info autore
Luigi Mazza has been an active planner mainly in the urban planning field. He is also the founding editor of the
Planning Theory journal
, and a member of the board of the
Town Planning Review, European Planning Studies, DISP, the
Planning Review, Spatium, International Review, and
Planning Theory, all of which have published his articles.
Riassunto
Planning and Citizenship seeks to rediscover planning’s technical and theoretical roots by reconstructing the memory of planning through the lens of the changing relationship between planning and citizenship.
