Liberal State and Criminal Sanction - Seeking Justice and Civility

Jonathan Jacobs examines the injustice of incarceration in the U.S. and U.K., both during incarceration and upon release into civil society. Situated at the intersection of criminology and political philosophy, Jacobs's focus is on moral reasoning, and he argues that the current state of incarceration is antithetical to the project of liberal democracy, as it strips incarcerated people of their agency. He advocates for reforms through a renewed commitment to the values and principles of liberal democracy and proposes a retributivist conception of sanction to reform the criminal justice system and emphasizes the importance of proportionality.

Sommario

• Preface


• Introduction


• Chapter 1: The Political Order


• 1.1 The Liberal Polity


• 1.2 Civil Society


• 1.3 Civil Society and Moral Education


• 1.4 The Rule of Law and Morality


• 1.5 Liberalism and Civility


• Chapter 2: Criminal Justice and Justice Overall Part I


• 2.1 Equality and Egalitarianism


• 2.2 Contexts, Liberty, and Egalitarianism


• 2.3 Criminal Justice, Distributive Justice, and the Liberal State


• 2.4 Criminal Justice, Distributive Justice, and Civility


• Chapter 3: Criminal Justice and Justice Overall Part II


• 3.1 Some Contextual Factors


• 3.2 To Which Values Should Criminal Justice Respond?


• 3.3 The Dispute Over Desert


• 3.4 Desert and Agency


• Chapter 4: Retributivism and Resentment


• 4.1 Reasons to Reclaim Retributivism


• 4.2 Concerns about Consequentialism


• 4.3 A Role for Resentment


• 4.4 What is Being Communicated by Criminal Conviction?


• Chapter 5: Deficits of Justice and Civility


• 5.1 The Harm Being Done


• 5.2 Some Important Aspects of Prison Culture


• Chapter 6: Retributive Sanction


• 6.1 Some Misconceptions about Retributivism


• 6.2 Distinguishing Diverse Retributivist Approaches


• 6.3 Communication and Proportionality


• 6.4 Better Outcomes Without Consequentialism


• Conclusion

Info autore

Jonathan Jacobs is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, and a member of the Doctoral Faculties of Philosophy and Criminal Justice at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He received his PhD from the University of Pennsylvania in 1983. He works on topics at the intersection of Ethics, Politics and Criminal Justice, and also on issues in medieval moral philosophy and Jewish philosophy. He has been a Visiting Professor or Visiting Scholar at the University of Edinburgh, the University of St. Andrews, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, and is a Life Member of Clare Hall, Cambridge. He has received grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Littauer Foundation, the Earhart Foundation, and was a Fulbright Scholar at the University of York.

Riassunto

In a liberal democracy, theory suggests that the political order and character of a civil society are closely connected: the political order allows for a dynamic and pluralistic civil society, and people's civic participation encourages support for the political order.

In examining the role of punishment in the U.S. and the U.K., however, Jonathan Jacobs maintains that the current state of incarceration is antithetical to the principles of a liberal democracy and betrays an abandonment of that project's essential values. The existing system imposes harsh injustices on incarcerated people: it subjects them to inhumane prison conditions, creates numerous obstacles that block their reentry into society upon release, and erodes their capacity to participate in civic life and exercise individual moral agency. And in recent decades, the number of its people that the U.S. has incarcerated has grown dramatically.

Jacobs engages with substantial philosophical literature to argue that necessary and significant reforms to the U.S. and U.K. criminal justice systems demand a serious recommitment to the values and principles of a liberal democracy. Topics include the justification and aims of punishment, the role of criminal justice within theories of a just society, and empirical considerations regarding long-term incarceration and its impact. By comprehensively exploring the relationship between criminal justice and justice, he highlights distinctive elements of criminal justice as the basis for a retributivist conception of punishment that highlights desert and proportionality. Jacobs defends retributivism against familiar accusations that it approves vindictiveness and inevitably harms offenders, and shows how consequentialist approaches are seriously flawed. Drawing equally from both philosophy and criminology, Jacobs argues for a renewed dedication to the values and principles of a liberal democracy as critical to the possibility of criminal justice being truly just.

Dettagli sul prodotto

• Autori: Jonathan A. Jacobs, Jonathan A. (Professor and Chair of Philos Jacobs, Jacobs Jonathan A.
• Editore: Oxford University Press
• Lingue: Inglese
• Formato: Copertina rigida
• Pubblicazione: 17.09.2020
• EAN: 9780190863623
• ISBN: 978-0-19-086362-3
• Pagine: 278
• Categorie: Scienze sociali, diritto, economia > Diritto > Diritto penale, diritto processuale penale, criminologia; SOCIAL SCIENCE / Penology, Penology and punishment, Penology & punishment