Ulteriori informazioni
This volume will address whether and to what extent those working to better understand or achieve climate justice should think about the real-world feasibility of their theories or proposals.
Sommario
Introduction, Corey Katz and Sarah Kenehan
1. Feasibility and Climate Justice, David Weisbach
2. Utopia, Feasibility, and the Need for Interpretive and Clinical Climate Ethics, Joshua McBee
3. Falling On Your Own Feasibility Sword? Challenges for Climate Policy Based on "Simple Self-Interest," Stephen Gardiner and Justin Lawson,
4. Climate Justice, Feasibility Constraints, and the Role of Political Philosophy, Brian Berkey
5. Is a Just Climate Policy Feasible?, Kirsten Meyer
6. The "Pathway Problem," Probabilistic Feasibility, and Non-ideal Climate Justice, Jared Houston
7. Making the Great Climate Transition: Between Justice and Feasibility, Fabian Schuppert
8. Is Climate Justice Feasible? A Psychological Perspective on Challenges and Opportunities for Achieving a Just Climate Regime, Ezra Markowitz and Andrew Monroe
9. Climate Change, Individual Preferences, and Procrastination, Fausto Corvino
10. COVID Pandemic and Climate Change: An Essay on Soft Constraints and Global Risks, Lukas H. Meyer and Marcelo de Araujo
About the Contributors
Index
Info autore
Corey Katz is assistant professor of philosophy at Georgian Court University and was the post-doctoral researcher in the ethics of sustainable development at the Center for Ethics and Human Values and the Philosophy Department at the Ohio State University. His research lies at the intersection of global, long-term environmental problems like climate change, and ethical and political philosophy.
Sarah Kenehan associate professor of philosophy at Marywood University and works on issues of climate justice, global justice, and applied ethics. Recent publications include: Food, Environment, and Climate: Justice at the Intersection (Rowman and Littlefield, ed. With Erinn Gilson).
Riassunto
This volume will address whether and to what extent those working to better understand or achieve climate justice should think about the real-world feasibility of their theories or proposals.
