Ulteriori informazioni
This book investigates the extent to which various scholarly labels are appropriate for the work of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. As Louis Menand wrote, "Holmes has been called a formalist, a positivist, a utilitarian, a realist, a historicist, a pragmatist, (not to mention a nihilist)." Each of the eight chapters investigates one label, analyzes the secondary texts that support the use of the term to characterize Holmes's philosophy, and takes a stand on whether or not the category is appropriate for Holmes by assessing his judicial and nonjudicial publications, including his books, articles, and posthumously published correspondences. The thrust of the collection as a whole, nevertheless, bends toward the stance that Holmes is a pragmatist in his jurisprudence, ethics, and politics. The final chapter, by Susan Haack, makes that case explicitly.
Edited by Seth Vannatta, this book will be of particular interest to students and faculty working in law, jurisprudence, philosophy, intellectual history, American Studies, political science, and constitutional theory.
Sommario
Introduction- Seth Vannatta
1.The Jobbist- Alexander Lian
2.The Nihilist- Raff Donelson
3.The Utilitarian- Frederic Kellogg
4.The Social Darwinist- Seth Vannatta and Sarah Woolwine
5.The Natural Law Theorist- Allen Mendenhall
6.The Positivist- Catharine Wells
7.The Legal Realist- Brian Butler
8.The Pragmatist- Susan Haack
Info autore
Seth Vannatta is professor and chair of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Morgan State University.
Riassunto
The Pragmatism and Prejudice of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. examines the varied categories scholars have used to describe the philosophy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. These include, “Jobbist,” Nihilist, Realist, Social Darwinist, Utilitarian, Positivist, Natural Law Theorist, and Pragmatist.
