Ulteriori informazioni
Sommario
PROLOGUE
Comparative law
Methodology
CHAPTER 1 – TORT: INTIMIDATION AND DURESS BY THREATS
1.1 Intimidation: English case law
1.2 New Zealand case law
1.3 Australian case law
1.4 Canadian case law
1.5 Hong Kong case law
1.6 Intimidation and three-party cases
1.7 The rationale for a tort of intimidation
1.8 Unlawful acts
1.9 Threatened breach of contract
1.10 Threats of lawful action
1.11 Defence of justification
1.12 Duress by threats as a tortious defence
1.13 Conclusions
CHAPTER 2 – CONTRACT: NECESSITY AND UNCONSCIONABLE BARGAIN
2.1 English case law
2.2 Australian case law
2.3 New Zealand case law
2.4 Hong Kong case law
2.5 Canadian case law
2.6 The rationale for unconscionable bargain
2.7 The boundaries of unconscionable bargain
2.8 Conclusions
CHAPTER 3 – CONTRACT: DURESS
3.1 The test for contractual duress
3.2 Threats to breach contract
3.3 Lawful act duress
3.4 Threats of prosecution and litigation
3.5 Causation, and burden of proof
3.6 Australian case law
3.7 New Zealand case law
3.8 Hong Kong case law
3.9 Canadian case law
3.10 The rationale for contractual duress
3.11 The relationship with undue influence
3.12 Conclusions
CHAPTER 4 – TORT AND CRIME: NECESSITY
4.1 Private necessity in tort
4.2 Private necessity in American tort law
4.3 Public necessity in tort
4.4 The rationale for tortious necessity
4.5 Best interests intervention in crime and tort
4.6 Lesser evil necessity in crime and tort
4.7 Conclusions
CHAPTER 5 – CRIMINAL LAW: DURESS
5.1 Types of threat
5.2 Pain and internal causes
5.3 Threats to whom?
5.4 Perception and response
Info autore
Nathan Tamblyn is Senior Lecturer at the University of Exeter Law School.
Riassunto
The language of duress and necessity is found in crime, tort and contract. This book explores those pleas, in both case law and theory, across subject boundaries, and across jurisdictions. It seeks to identify the lessons which each area of law can learn from the others, and to tease out common themes while demarcating important differences.
