Ulteriori informazioni
Zusatztext [A] well-researched, clear and extended analysis of the work of the Commissions. Informationen zum Autor Shona Wilson Stark is a University Lecturer in Public Law at the Law Faculty at the University of Cambridge, and an Official Fellow of Girton College, Cambridge. Photograph courtesy of University of Cambridge. Vorwort The first comprehensive study of the work and effectiveness of the law commissions in the UK. Zusammenfassung The Law Commission (of England and Wales) and the Scottish Law Commission were both established in 1965 to promote the reform of the laws of their respective jurisdictions. Since then, they have each produced hundreds of reports across many areas of law. They are independent of government yet rely on governmental funding and governmental approval of their proposed projects. They also rely on both government and Parliament (and, occasionally, the courts or other bodies) to implement their proposals. This book examines the tension between independence and implementation and recommends how a balance can best be struck. It proposes how the Commissions should choose their projects given that their duties outweigh their resources, and how we should assess the success, or otherwise, of their output. Countries around the world have created law reform bodies in the Commissions’ image. They may wish to reflect on the GB Commissions’ responses to the changes and challenges they have faced to reappraise their own law reform machinery. Equally, the GB Commissions may seek inspiration from other commissions’ experiences. The world the GB Commissions inhabit now is very different from when they were established. They have evolved to remain relevant in the face of devolution, the UK’s changing relationship with the European Union, increasing pressure for accountability and decreasing funding. Further changes to secure the future of independent law reform are advanced in this book. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Introduction I. Lifting the Law Reform BonnetII. Beyond Great Britain III. Overview IV. Some Final Preliminaries 2. The Origins of the Law Commissions I. Pre-1965 II. How Soon is ‘Now’: Why 1965?III. Pressures for a Scottish Law Commission IV. The Law Commissions Act 1965 V. Consequent Issues3. The Scope of Commission Activity I. The 1965 Act and Discretion II. The Need to Control and Facilitate the Exercise of Discretion III. Previous Deficiencies in the Control and Facilitation of the Commissions’ Exercise of Discretion IV. The Project-Selection Criteria V. Developing and Strengthening the Criteria VI. Conclusion: Clarifying and Securing the Scope of Commission Activity 4. The Extent of Implementation I. Preliminary Issues II. Reasons for Non-Implementation III. The Importance of Being Implemented IV. Attempts to Improve Implementation V. Conclusion: Quality Over Quantity5. The Codification Task I. Definition of Codification II. Reasons for Tasking the Commissions with Codification III. Pre-Existing Obstacles to Codification IV. Developments Reducing the Need for Codification V. The Commissions’ Codification Track Records VI. Conclusion: Substance Over Style 6. From Harmonisation to Devolution and Brexit I. Collaborative Projects II. Individual Projects III. Devolution IV. Conclusion: Separate Commissions Working in Sync 7. Law Reform… Now? I. Servicing our Law Reform Machinery II. Proposed Amendments to the 1965 Act III. Final Remarks for Great Britain and Beyond...
