Fr. 55.50

Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration - Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy

Inglese · Tascabile

Spedizione di solito entro 3 a 5 settimane

Descrizione

Ulteriori informazioni










Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes.

Sommario










1. Introduction; 2. Proportionality and deference in theoretical perspective; 3. Operationalizing deference in the context of proportionality analysis: comparative approaches; 4. Methods of review employed by investment tribunals in regulatory disputes; 5. The development of an institutionally sensitive approach to proportionality analysis in investor-state arbitration; 6. Other issues affecting the method and standard of review in investor-state arbitration; Conclusion.

Info autore

Caroline Henckels is Senior Lecturer in Law at Monash University, Melbourne, and was previously Vice-Chancellor's Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Law at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Riassunto

Investment treaty arbitration urgently requires a certain and consistent way of deciding regulatory disputes that pays due respect to the competing imperatives of investment protection and regulatory autonomy. Caroline Henckels argues that in such cases investment tribunals should employ proportionality analysis in combination with an institutionally sensitive standard of review.

Recensioni dei clienti

Per questo articolo non c'è ancora nessuna recensione. Scrivi la prima recensione e aiuta gli altri utenti a scegliere.

Scrivi una recensione

Top o flop? Scrivi la tua recensione.

Per i messaggi a CeDe.ch si prega di utilizzare il modulo di contatto.

I campi contrassegnati da * sono obbligatori.

Inviando questo modulo si accetta la nostra dichiarazione protezione dati.