Ulteriori informazioni
Zusatztext "A concise! thoughtful and illuminating volume of essays on nine select members of the Supreme Court (past and present)! highlighting each justice's distinctive approach to the freedom of expression. ? Judging Free Speech would make an excellent supplement to a course on the First Amendment or judicial decision making. ? many scholars may find pieces in this volume useful for their own research. My judgment: Judging Free Speech is highly recommended." (Wayne Batchis! Law and Politics Book Review! lpbr.net! Vol. 26 (3)! July! 2016) "Knowles (political science! SUNY Oswego) and Lichtman (political science! Shippensburg) have coedited a delightful work in which the chapter authors take a justice of the Supreme Court and analyze in detail his or her opinions and jurisprudence on the issue of First Amendment free speech. ? this work is for anyone with an interest in the courts! the First Amendment! free speech! or any of the nine justices covered. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above." (M. W. Bowers! Choice! Vol. 53 (10)! June! 2016) Informationen zum Autor Keith J. Bybee, Syracuse University, USA Douglas E. Edlin, Dickinson College, USA James C. Foster, Oregon State University, USA Frederick P. Lewis, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA Kevin J. McMahon, Trinity College - Connecticut, USA Samuel R. Olken, The John Marshall Law School, USA Michael Paris, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, USA Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School, USA Klappentext Judging Free Speech contains nine original essays by political scientists and law professors, each providing a comprehensive, yet concise and accessible overview of the free speech jurisprudence of a United States Supreme Court Justice. Zusammenfassung Judging Free Speech contains nine original essays by political scientists and law professors! each providing a comprehensive! yet concise and accessible overview of the free speech jurisprudence of a United States Supreme Court Justice. Inhaltsverzeichnis Introduction: Oh What A Tangled Web We Weave (Helen J. Knowles And Steven B. Lichtman) 1. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. And The 'Marketplace Of Ideas': Experience Proves To Be The 'Life Of The Law' (Frederick Lewis) 2. George Sutherland And The Business Of Expression (Samuel R. Olken) 3. Absolutism And Democracy: Hugo L. Black's Free Speech Jurisprudence (Michael Paris And Kevin J. Mcmahon) 4. 'Another's Lyric': John Marshall Harlan II, Judicial Conservatism, And Free Speech (Douglas E. Edlin) 5. Justice Civility: William J. Brennan Jr.'S Free Speech Jurisprudence (James C. Foster) 6. Potter Stewart Meets The Press (Keith J. Bybee) 7. Anthony M. Kennedy: 'Speech Is The Beginning Of Thought' (Helen J. Knowles) 8. Black Like Me: The Free Speech Jurisprudence Of Clarence Thomas (Steven B. Lichtman) 9. Stephen Breyer And The First Amendment As Legal Doctrine (Mark Tushnet) Conclusion: It's Complicated . . . (Helen J. Knowles And Steven B. Lichtman)...
Sommario
Introduction: Oh What A Tangled Web We Weave (Helen J. Knowles And Steven B. Lichtman) 1. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. And The 'Marketplace Of Ideas': Experience Proves To Be The 'Life Of The Law' (Frederick Lewis) 2. George Sutherland And The Business Of Expression (Samuel R. Olken) 3. Absolutism And Democracy: Hugo L. Black's Free Speech Jurisprudence (Michael Paris And Kevin J. Mcmahon) 4. 'Another's Lyric': John Marshall Harlan II, Judicial Conservatism, And Free Speech (Douglas E. Edlin) 5. Justice Civility: William J. Brennan Jr.'S Free Speech Jurisprudence (James C. Foster) 6. Potter Stewart Meets The Press (Keith J. Bybee) 7. Anthony M. Kennedy: 'Speech Is The Beginning Of Thought' (Helen J. Knowles) 8. Black Like Me: The Free Speech Jurisprudence Of Clarence Thomas (Steven B. Lichtman) 9. Stephen Breyer And The First Amendment As Legal Doctrine (Mark Tushnet) Conclusion: It's Complicated . . . (Helen J. Knowles And Steven B. Lichtman)
Relazione
"A concise, thoughtful and illuminating volume of essays on nine select members of the Supreme Court (past and present), highlighting each justice's distinctive approach to the freedom of expression. ... Judging Free Speech would make an excellent supplement to a course on the First Amendment or judicial decision making. ... many scholars may find pieces in this volume useful for their own research. My judgment: Judging Free Speech is highly recommended." (Wayne Batchis, Law and Politics Book Review, lpbr.net, Vol. 26 (3), July, 2016)
"Knowles (political science, SUNY Oswego) and Lichtman (political science, Shippensburg) have coedited a delightful work in which the chapter authors take a justice of the Supreme Court and analyze in detail his or her opinions and jurisprudence on the issue of First Amendment free speech. ... this work is for anyone with an interest in the courts, the First Amendment, free speech, or any of the nine justices covered. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above." (M. W. Bowers, Choice, Vol. 53 (10), June, 2016)
