Ulteriori informazioni
The most significant philosopher of Being, Martin Heidegger has nevertheless largely been ignored within communications studies. This book sets the record straight by demonstrating the profound implications of his unique philosophical project for our understanding of today's mediascape.
Sommario
Introduction
1 We Need to Talk About Media
2 Mediated Truth
3 In Media Res
4 The Dasign of Media Apps: The Questions Concerning New Technologies
Conclusion
Info autore
David Gunkel is professor of communication at Northern Illinois University. He is the managing editor of the 'International Journal of Zizek Studies'.
Paul A. Taylor is associate professor in the Institute of Communication Studies at the University of Leeds.His previous publications include
Zizek and the Media (Polity, 2011). He is the General Editor of the 'International Journal of Zizek Studies' and Editorial Board Member of the 'International Journal of Baudrillard Studies', 'Fast Capitalism' and the 'International Journal of Badiou Studies'.
Riassunto
The most significant philosopher of Being, Martin Heidegger has nevertheless largely been ignored within communications studies. This book sets the record straight by demonstrating the profound implications of his unique philosophical project for our understanding of today s mediascape.
Relazione
"At last, a long overdue account of Heidegger's profound relevance for understanding contemporary media. Gunkel and Taylor shed powerful light onto the philosophical corners of media and cultural studies that more timid scholars have stubbornly failed to reach. Neither Heidegger studies nor media studies will remain the same after the impact of this immensely engaging theoretical tour de force!"
Slavoj Zizek, International Director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, London
"Gunkel and Taylor reveal an unacknowledged dimension of Heidegger's media theory which contradicts the predominant understanding of his work. They argue that there is something to be found in Heidegger's thought which prevents one from succumbing to a widespread illusion - the illusion of the neutrality of technique, what McLuhan later called "the current somnambulism". Thus, a profoundly productive, critical dimension in Heidegger's theory becomes accessible which stands in harsh opposition to the "somnambulism" that this philosopher himself performed in his utterly problematic personal, ideological existence. Gunkel and Taylor perspicuously show how Heidegger could have done better, had he more carefully listened to his own findings. And we? We definitely can: under the condition that we do."
Robert Pfaller, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Applied Arts, Vienna
