Sold out

Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking - Methods and Practices

English · Hardback

Description

Read more

Test equating methods are used with many standardized tests in education and psychology to ensure that scores from multiple test forms can be used interchangeably. In recent years, researchers from the education, psychology, and statistics communities have contributed to the rapidly growing statistical and psychometric methodologies used in test equating. This book provides an introduction to test equating which both discusses the most frequently used equating methodologies and covers many of the practical issues involved.
This edition expands upon the coverage of the first edition by providing a new chapter on test scaling and a second on test linking. Test scaling is the process of developing score scales that are used when scores on standardized tests are reported. In test linking, scores from two or more tests are related to one another. Linking has received much recent attention, due largely to investigations of linking similarly named tests from different test publishers or tests constructed for different purposes. The expanded coverage in the second edition also includes methodology for using polytomous item response theory in equating. The themes of the second edition include: the purposes of equating, scaling and linking and their practical context data collection designs statistical methodology designing reasonable and useful equating, scaling, and linking studies importance of test development and quality control processes to equating equating error, and the underlying statistical assumptions for equating.

List of contents

Contents
Preface
Notation
1 Introduction and Concepts
1.1 Equating and Related Concepts
1.1.1 Test Forms and Test Specifications
1.1.2 Equating
1.1.3 Processes That Are Related to Equating
1.1.4 Equating and Score Scales
1.1.5 Equating and the Test Score Decline of the 1960s and 1970s
1.2 Equating and Scaling in Practice-A Brief Overview of This Book
1.3 Properties of Equating
1.3.1 Symmetry Property
1.3.2 Same Specifications Property
1.3.3 Equity Properties
1.3.4 Observed Score Equating Properties
1.3.5 Group Invariance Property
1.4 Equating Designs
1.4.1 Random Groups Design
1.4.2 Single Group Design
1.4.3 Single Group Design with Counterbalancing
1.4.4 ASVAB Problems with a Single Group Design
1.4.5 Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design
1.4.6 NAEP Reading Anomaly-Problems with Common Items
1.5 Error in Estimating Equating Relationships
1.6 Evaluating the Results of Equating
1.7 Testing Situations Considered
1.8 Preview
1.9 Exercises
2 Observed Score Equating Using the Random Groups Design
2.1 Mean Equating
2.2 Linear Equating
2.3 Properties of Mean and Linear Equating
2.4 Comparison of Mean and Linear Equating
2.5 Equipercentile Equating
2.5.1 Graphical Procedures
2.5.2 Analytic Procedures
2.5.3 Properties of Equated Scores in Equipercentile Equating
2.6 Estimating Observed Score Equating Relationships
2.7 Scale Scores
2.7.1 Linear Conversions
2.7.2 Truncation of Linear Conversions
2.7.3 Nonlinear Conversions
2.8 Equating Using Single Group Designs
2.9 Equating Using Alternate Scoring Schemes
2.10 Preview of What Follows
2.11 Exercises
3 Random Groups-Smoothing in Equipercentile Equating
3.1 A Conceptual Statistical Framework for Smoothing
3.2 Properties of Smoothing Methods
3.3 Presmoothing Methods
3.3.1 Polynomial Log-linear Method
3.3.2 Strong True Score Method
3.3.3 Illustrative Example
3.4 Postsmoothing Methods
3.4.1 Illustrative Example
3.5 Practical Issues in Equipercentile Equating
3.5.1 Summary of Smoothing Strategies
3.5.2 Equating Error and Sample Size
3.6 Exercises
4 Nonequivalent Groups-Linear Methods
4.1 Tucker Method
4.1.1 Linear Regression Assumptions
4.1.2 Conditional Variance Assumptions
4.1.3 Intermediate Results
4.1.4 Final Results
4.1.5 Special Cases
4.2 Levine Observed Score Method
4.2.1 Correlational Assumptions
4.2.2 Linear Regression Assumptions
4.2.3 Error Variance Assumptions
4.2.4 Intermediate Results
4.2.5 General Results
4.2.6 Classical Congeneric Model Results
4.3 Levine True Score Method
4.3.1 Results
4.3.2 First-Order Equity
4.4 Illustrative Example and Other Topics
4.4.1 Illustrative Example
4.4.2 Synthetic Population Weights
4.4.3 Mean Equating
4.4.4 Decomposing Observed Di.erences in Means and Variances
4.4.5 Relationships Among Tucker and Levine Equating Methods
4.4.6 Scale Scores
4.5 Appendix Proof that ó2 s (TX) = ã2 1ó2 s (TV ) Under the Classical Congeneric Model
4.6 Exercises
5 Nonequivalent Groups-Equipercentile Methods
5.1 Frequency Estimation Equipercentile Equating
5.1.1 Conditional Distributions
5.1.2 Frequency Estimation Method
5.1.3 Evaluating the Frequency Estimation Assumption
5.1.4 Numerical Example
5.1.5 Estimating the Distributions
5.2 Braun-Holland Linear Method
5.3 Chained Equipercentile Equating
5.4 Illustrative Example
5.4.1 Illustrative Results
5.4.2 Comparison Among Methods
5.4.3 Practical Issues in Equipercentile Equating with Common Items
5.5 Exercises
6 Item Response Theory Methods
6.1 Some Necessary IRT Concepts
6.1.1 Unidimensionality and Local Independence Assumptions
6.1.2 IRT Models
6.1.3 IRT Parameter Estimation
6.2 Transformations of IRT Scales
6.2.1 Transformation Equations
6.2.2 Demonstrating the Appropriateness of Scale Transformations
6.2.3 Expressing A and B Constants
6.2.4 Expressing A and B Constants in Terms of Groups of Items and/or Person

Report

"Given the perennial debates about academic standards and grade inflation, it is my view that tools such as those described in this book should be adopted much more widely by the academic community than they are at present. This book provides an excellent overview, and I strongly recommend it." (Short Book Reviews of the ISI, April 2005)

"I highly recommend this book to everybody who has any interest in equating and linking, be they a student, practitioner, or researcher." (Psychometrika, 2006)

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.