Read more
Zusatztext ...I am confident it will spark debate in many areas of international investment law and provide somewhat of a blueprint for subsequent comparative analysis that aim at informing public international law. Informationen zum Autor Stephan Schill is a senior research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg. He is admitted to practice as a "Rechtsanwalt " in Germany and as an Attorney-at-law in New York. He was formerly the international arbitration law clerk to the Honorable Charles N. Brower, 20 Essex Street Chambers, London. As such, he worked on international commercial and investor-State disputes under various arbitral rules, including ICSID, NAFTA, ICC, SCC, LCIA and UNCITRAL Rules. Prior to that he was a Research Scholar at New York University School of Law and a law clerk to Judge Abdul G. Koroma at the International Court of Justice. He holds a Ph.D./Dr. iur. from Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main that he prepared under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Armin von Bogdandy. He authored several articles in leading international law journals and a book on The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Klappentext International investment law is one of fastest-growing areas of international law! but it is plagued by the vagueness of many investors' rights and unpredictable investment tribunal decisions. This books analyses international investment law through the lens of comparative public law to clarify investment treaty obligations and arbitral procedure. Zusammenfassung Investment treaty arbitration has a hybrid nature combining public international law (as regards its substance) with elements of international commercial arbitration (mainly as regards procedure). However, in essence and function it deals with a special, internationalised form of judicial review of governmental conduct that is more akin to the judicial control of governmental action provided for by national administrative and constitutional law than to either classic inter-state dispute resolution or international commercial arbitration.This has been recognised in some academic writing and several awards, where reference to national administrative law concepts and principles of international law-based judicial review of governmental action, such as international trade or human rights law, is used to help specify and apply the open-ended concepts of investment treaties. In-depth conceptualization is however often lacking. The current study is the first, pioneering effort to bring these under-developed ad hoc references to comparative and international administrative law concepts into a deeper theoretic and systematic framework.The book thus intends to develop a 'bridge' between treaty-based international investment arbitration and comparative administrative law on both a theoretical and practical level. The major obligations in investment treaties (indirect expropriation, fair and equitable treatment, national treatment, umbrella/sanctity of contract clause) and major procedural principles will be compared with their counterpart in comparative public law, both on the domestic as well as international level. That 'bridge' will allow international investment law to benefit from the comparative public law experience, which could enhance its legitimacy, its political acceptance, and its ability to develop more finely-tuned interpretations of central treaty obligations. Inhaltsverzeichnis Part I - Concepts and Foundations; 1: Stephan W. Schill: International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law - An Introduction; 2: Giacinto della Cananea: Minimum Standards of Procedural Justice in Administrative Adjudication; 3: Benedict Kingsbury and Stephan W. Schill: Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors' Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest - The Concept of Proportionality; Part II - Investor ...
