Read more
Zusatztext It can be readily seen ... that this book contains much that touches on current debates in New Zealand and in particular will be of interest to those engaged in reviewing the performance of the Evidence Act of 2006...Honours and Masters students studying evidence or criminal procedure should be reading the relevant papers in this book. Informationen zum Autor John D Jackson is Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Law, University of Nottingham. He is the author of a number of books on evidence and criminal procedure including Northern Ireland Supplement to Cross on Evidence (1983), Called to Court: A Public View of Criminal Justice in Northern Ireland (1991) (with R Kilpatrick and C Harvey), Judge without Jury: Diplock Trials in the Adversary System (1995) (with Sean Doran), The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings (2000) (with Sean Doran), Standards for Prosecutors: An Analysis of the United Kingdom National Prosecuting Agencies (2006) (with Barry Hancock), Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context (2008)(with P. Tillers and M. Langer) and Standards for Prosecutors: An Analysis of the National Prosecuting Agencies in Ireland, New South Wales (Australia), The Netherlands and Denmark (2009)(with Barry Hancock). Maximo Langer is Acting Professor of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles. Klappentext This book aims to honour the work of Professor Mirjan DamaSka, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School and a prominent authority for many years in the fields of comparative law, procedural law, evidence, international criminal law and Continental legal history. Professor DamaSka 's work is renowned for providing new frameworks for understanding different legal traditions. To celebrate the depth and richness of his work and discuss its implications for the future, the editors have brought together an impressive range of leading scholars from different jurisdictions in the fields of comparative and international law, evidence and criminal law and procedure. Using Professor DamaSka's work as a backdrop, the essays make a substantial contribution to the development of comparative law, procedure and evidence. After an introduction by the editors and a tribute by Harold Koh, Dean of Yale Law School, the book is divided into four parts. The first part considers contemporary trends in national criminal procedure, examining cross-fertilisation and the extent to which these trends are resulting in converging practices across national jurisdictions. The second part explores the epistemological environment of rules of evidence and procedure. The third part analyses human rights standards and the phenomenon of hybridisation in transnational and international criminal law. The final part of the book assesses Professor DamaSka 's contribution to comparative law and the challenges faced by comparative law in the twenty first century. Zusammenfassung This book aims to honour the work of Professor Mirjan Damaška, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School and a prominent authority for many years in the fields of comparative law, procedural law, evidence, international criminal law and Continental legal history. Professor Damaška 's work is renowned for providing new frameworks for understanding different legal traditions. To celebrate the depth and richness of his work and discuss its implications for the future, the editors have brought together an impressive range of leading scholars from different jurisdictions in the fields of comparative and international law, evidence and criminal law and procedure. Using Professor Damaška's work as a backdrop, the essays make a substantial contribution to the development of comparative law, procedure and evidence. After an introduction by the editors and a tribute by Harold Koh, Dean of Yale Law School, the book is divided into four parts. The f...
Summary
Using Professor Damaska's work as a backdrop, this book substantially contributes to the development of comparative law, procedure and evidence.
