Read more
Zusatztext The great merit of this book is certainly the impressive empirical work providing us with a systematic description of infinitival complementation in OE...[a] significant contribution...to our understanding of infinitival syntax in the history of English. Informationen zum Autor Bettelou Los is a Lecturer in Linguistics at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. She graduated from the University of Amsterdam in 1986 and has since held teaching and research positions at the University of Amsterdam, the Vrije Universiteit, the University of Nijmegen and other colleges of higher education. She participates in the research program The Diachrony of Complex Predicates in West Germanic, and has published several papers on diachronic syntax. She contributes with Wim van der Wurff to the morphology and syntax section of The Year's Work in English Studies and is co-editing with Ans van Kemenade is co-editing The Blackwell Handbook of the History of English. Klappentext This book describes the historical emergence and spread of the to-infinitive in English. The exposition is clear and does not assume an up-to-date knowledge of generative theory. The book will appeal to the wide spectrum of scholars interested in the transformation of Old to Middle English as well as to those studying the processes and causes of syntactic change more generally. Zusammenfassung This book describes the historical emergence and spread of the to-infinitive in English. It shows that to + infinitive emerged from a reanalysis of the preposition to plus a deverbal nominalization, which spread first to purpose clauses, then to other nonfinite environments. The book challenges the traditional reasoning that infinitives must have been nouns in Old English because they inflected for dative case and can follow prepositions. Dr Los shows that, even as early as Old English, the to-infinitive was established in most of the environments in which it is found today. She argues that its spread was largely due to competition with subjunctive that-clauses, which it gradually replaced. Later chapters consider Middle English developments. The author provides a measured evaluation of the evidence that to undergoes a period of degrammaticalization. She concludes that the extent to which to gains syntactic freedom in Middle English is due to the fact that speakers began to equate it with the modal verbs and therefore to treat it syntactically as a modal verb. The exposition is clear and does not assume an up-to-date knowledge of generative theory. The book will appeal to the wide spectrum of scholars interested in the transformation from Old to Middle English, as well as those studying the processes and causes of syntactic change more generally. Inhaltsverzeichnis Part I: Introduction 1: Introduction Part II: The to-infinitive as GOAL 2: The Expression of Purpose in Old English 3: The to-infinitive as GOAL-argument Part III: The to-infinitive as THEME 4: Intention 5: Commanding and Permitting 6: Commissives Part IV: Syntactic Status 7: The Category of the to-infinitive 8: The Changing Status of Infinitival to Part V: Changes in Middle English 9: The Rise of to-infinitival Exceptional case-Marking 10: Innocent Bystander: The Loss of the Indefinite Pronoun man Part VI: Summary and Conclusions 11: Summary and Conclusions Appendix References Index ...
