Read more
This research aims to examine the criteria on the use of technological tools -WhatsApp- from different methods of interpretation of the norms that have been the subject of wide discussion among jurists, due to the attribution of judges to solve cases by giving a specific meaning to the normative provisions, as well as their application to the matter under study, their characteristics and consequences.In this sense, the aim is to explore the different positions that judges -Jupiter, Hercules and Hermes- could adopt for the solution of a similar problem based on different interpretations of the Colombian context, verifying the existence of norms that imply the use of these canons. It is worth asking, in what way has the criterion of the Supreme Court of Justice regarding the use of WhatsApp as a procedural tool for personal notification been influenced by the methods of judicial interpretation?
About the author
Advogada com Mestrado em Direito Processual, Especialista em Direito Processual e Filosofia do Direito, com experiência na jurisdição do contencioso administrativo desenvolvida no Poder Judiciário, bem como no sector privado lecionando nas áreas de Processo Civil, Teoria Geral do Processo e Teoria do Negócio Jurídico.
