Fr. 53.50

Comprehensive Deterrence Theory - The Science and Policy of Punishment

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










"This book offers a comprehensive understanding of classical deterrence theory, its limitations, and presents a new, reconceptualized account of how legal punishment can deter crime. Ideal for scholars, researchers, policymakers, and the general public, the book includes recommended chapter sequences, examples, and a new theory to improve policy"--

List of contents










1. Introduction; 2. The Need for Reconceptualizing Deterrence Theory; 3. Research on Deterrence;Comprehensive Deterrence Theory: Intrinsic Elements; 5. Comprehensive Deterrence Theory: Principles; 6. Comprehensive Deterrence Theory: Next Steps for Advancing CDT; 7. Comprehensive Deterrence Theory: Points of Clarification; 8. Comprehensive Deterrence Theory: Policy Implications; 9. Conclusion.

About the author

Daniel P. Mears is Distinguished Research Professor at Florida State University. A Fellow of the American Society of Criminology, he has published widely on crime and justice. Previously, he served as a Senior Research Associate at the Urban Institute, Peace Corps Volunteer, and program counselor working with adolescents.Mark C. Stafford is a Professor at Texas State University's School of Criminal Justice and Criminology. He has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University and published extensively on deterrence and rational-choice behavior. He is a co-author of American Delinquency (1999) and Sex Crimes and Sex Offenders (2017).

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.