TADS VS CONVENTIONAL ANCHORAGE METHODS DURING CANINE RETRACTION - EFFECTIVE ANCHORAGE POTENTIAL OF TADS VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS DURING INDIVIDUAL CANINE RETRACTION. DE

Anchorage control is crucial to prevent unwanted tooth movement during space closure. Traditional anchorage devices, such as transpalatal arches and headgear, have limitations like the need for patient compliance and less effective anchorage. This has led to the development of skeletal anchorage devices like Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) and miniplates, which offer superior stability, require less patient involvement, and do not affect occlusion.Current evidence shows that mini-implants provide better canine retraction and anchorage control compared to conventional methods.

About the author

I am Dr. Ushmita Mehta. I have done my BDS from Dr Harvansh singh judge institute of dental science, Chandigarh. Currently i am pursuing my MDS in department of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics from Subharti dental college, Meerut.

Product details

• Authors: Amit Kumar Khera, Ushmita Mehta, C. Munish Reddy
• Publisher: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
• Languages: English
• Product format: Paperback / Softback
• Released: 20.09.2024
• EAN: 9786208065560
• ISBN: 9786208065560
• No. of pages: 64
• Subject: Natural sciences, medicine, IT, technology > Medicine > Dentistry