Fr. 90.00

Haves and Have Nots in Supreme Court Representation and - Participation, 2016 to 202

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










Courts are often thought of as protectors of minority rights. What happens when the composition of courts changes such that politically disadvantaged groups expect a less favorable reception? This Element examines whether the increasing conservatism of the US Supreme Court during Donald Trump's presidency changed the behavior of litigants and amicus curiae. The authors test whether membership changes led to reduced filings by individuals and organizations representing marginalized groups and increased filings by businesses and conservative states and interest groups. The authors find substantial reductions in participation by the most politically disadvantaged and substantial increases in participation by the most conservative groups.

List of contents

1. Introduction: supreme court membership change and its consequences; 2. Changes in petitioner behavior; 3. Changes in amicus behavior; 4. Elections have consequences: looking beyond trump's justices; References.

Summary

This Element examines whether the increasing conservatism of the US Supreme Court during Donald Trump's presidency changed the behavior of litigants and amicus curiae. The authors find substantial reductions in participation by the most politically disadvantaged and substantial increases in participation by the most conservative groups.

Foreword

This Element shows that elections matter, as seen in the impact of Trump's Supreme Court appointments.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.