Read more
Efforts to promote creativity often centre on encouraging people to engage in 'design thinking', 'systems thinking' and 'entrepreneurial thinking'. These different approaches are most often defined, taught and applied in mutual isolation, which has obscured what distinguishes them from each other, what they have in common and how they might be combined. These three approaches are also most often described in isolation from the approaches that characterize other disciplines, all of which are relevant to how problems are identified, framed and solved. These other approaches include 'computational thinking', 'engineering thinking', 'scientific thinking', 'evolutionary thinking', 'mathematical thinking', 'statistical thinking', 'geographical thinking', 'historical thinking', 'anthropological thinking' and many more. Examining these approaches as a set allows each of them to be better understood, and also reveals the connections and contrasts between them. Such comparisons provide the foundation for a more coordinated project to represent how different disciplinary approaches contribute to creative work.
List of contents
1. Considering disciplinary approaches; 2. Establishing terminology and scope; 3. Describing disciplinary approaches; 4. Collecting disciplinary approaches; 5. Reviewing components of disciplinary approaches; 6. Examining claims about disciplinary approaches; 7. Mapping disciplinary approaches to each other; 8. Reconsidering disciplinary approaches; References.
Summary
This Element explores design thinking, systems thinking and entrepreneurial thinking as a set. This allows each of them to be better understood, revealing the connections and contrasts between them. Such comparisons provide the foundation for a more coordinated project to represent how different disciplinary approaches contribute to creative work.
Foreword
Design thinking, systems thinking and entrepreneurial thinking are best understood in relation to each other rather than in isolation.
