Read more
This volume argues that contemporary political and security revisionism should not be considered a homogenous attack against the international order but rather a bag of tailor-made strategies to exploit opportunities found in various, highly localised contexts.
List of contents
Introduction - Political Revisionism: Old and New 1. Contemporary Revisionism in the Multilayered Political Order: Operationalisation, Techno-Social Conditions, Dilemmas 2. Russian, US and Chinese Revisionism: Bridging Domestic and Great Power Politics 3. Russian Revisionism, Legal Discourse and the 'Rules-Based' International Order 4. Between Pastiche and Sampling: NATO's Strategic Adaptation to Russian Revisionism 5. Building a Multiple 'Security Shelter' in the Baltic States after EU and NATO Accession 6. Accommodating Revisionism through Balancing Regionalism: The Case of Central Asia 7. The Perils of Path Dependency: Germany's Russia Policy 8. From Revolution to 'Counter-Revolution': Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe 30 Years On
About the author
Nik Hynek is Professor specialising in Security Studies at Metropolitan University, Prague, Czech Republic, and in the Department of Security Studies in Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. He leads the inter-scientific Charles University Research Centre of Excellence dedicated to the topic of 'Human-Machine Nexus and the Implications for the International Order'. His forthcoming monograph is titled
Militarizing Artificial Intelligence: Theory, Technology and Regulation (with Anzhelika Solovyeva, Routledge 2022).
Vít St¿ítecký is Associate Professor of Security Studies and Head of the Department of Security Studies at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. He is a founding member of Periculum, Charles University Centre of Excellence, where he develops interdisciplinary research focusing on machine learning deployment in social context and related regulatory policies. His most recent publications appeared in
ACM Computing Surveys and
Futures.
Summary
This volume argues that contemporary political and security revisionism should not be considered a homogenous attack against the international order but rather a bag of tailor-made strategies to exploit opportunities found in various, highly localised contexts.
