Fr. 210.00

Rhetoricity of Philosophy - Audience in Perelman and Ricoeur After the Badiou-Cassin Debate

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










This book aims to recast the way that philosophers understand rhetoric. Rather than follow most philosophers in conceiving rhetoric as a specific way of speaking or writing, it shows that rhetoric is better understood as a dimension of all human discourse and action-what the author calls "rhetoricity".

List of contents










Introduction 1. The Enemy of My Enemy: Philosophy, Sophistics, and Rhetoric in the Badiou-Cassin Debate 2. The Audience in Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric 3. Rhetoric on Trial (I): Badiou v. Perelman 4. Rhetoric on Trial (II): Cassin v. Perelman 5. Extending the Audience: Ricoeur's Missed Encounter with Perelman 6. Ricoeur and the Rhetoricity of Philosophy Conclusion: Is Rhetoric a Dead End for Philosophy?


About the author










Blake D. Scott is Postdoctoral Research Associate at KU Leuven's Institute of Philosophy. His articles have appeared in journals including Philosophy & Rhetoric, Informal Logic, Argumentation, Études Ricoeuriennes/ Ricoeur Studies, Analecta Hermeneutica, and Sartre Studies International.


Summary

This book aims to recast the way that philosophers understand rhetoric. Rather than follow most philosophers in conceiving rhetoric as a specific way of speaking or writing, it shows that rhetoric is better understood as a dimension of all human discourse and action—what the author calls “rhetoricity”.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.