Read more
This book argues that misinformation poses a multifaceted threat to knowledge, while arguing that some forms of content moderation risk exacerbating these threats. It proposes alternative forms of content moderation that aim to address this complexity while enhancing human epistemic agency.
The proliferation of fake news, false conspiracy theories, and other forms of misinformation on the internet and especially social media is widely recognized as a threat to individual knowledge and, consequently, to collective deliberation and democracy itself. This book argues that misinformation presents a three-pronged threat to knowledge. While researchers often focus on the role of misinformation in causing false beliefs, this deceptive potential of misinformation exists alongside the potential to suppress trust and to distort the perception of evidence. Recognizing the multifaceted nature of this threat is essential to the development of effective measures to mitigate the harms associated with misinformation. The book weaves together work in analytic epistemology with emerging empirical work in other disciplines to offer novel insights into the threats posed by misinformation. Additionally, it breaks new ground by systematically assessing different forms of content moderation from the perspective of epistemology.
Misinformation, Content Moderation, and Epistemology will appeal to philosophers working in applied and social epistemology, as well as scholars and advanced students in disciplines such as communication studies, political science, and social psychology who are researching misinformation.
The Introduction and Chapter 1 of this book are freely available as downloadable Open Access PDFs at http://www.taylorfrancis.com under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY- NC- ND) 4.0 license.
List of contents
Introduction: Knowledge Under Threat Part 1: The Threat of Misinformation 1. How Misinformation Prevents Knowing 2. Conspiracy Theories and Runaway Skepticism 3. Ambiguity, Fakery, and Social Evidence Part 2: The Promise of Content Moderation 4. Damned if You Do: The Case Against Content Moderation 5. Damned if You Don't: The Case for Content Moderation 6. Collaborative Content Moderation Epilogue: Online, Digital Soldiers
About the author
Keith Raymond Harris is a postdoctoral researcher in philosophy at Ruhr-Universität Bochum, where he specializes in social and applied epistemology and the philosophy of cognitive science. His recent publications include “Real Fakes: The Epistemology of Online Misinformation,” “Epistemic Domination,” and “Beyond Belief: On Disinformation and Manipulation.”
Summary
This book argues that misinformation poses a multi-faceted threat to knowledge, while arguing that some forms of content moderation risk exacerbating these threats. It proposes alternative forms of content moderation that aim to address this complexity while enhancing human epistemic agency.
Report
"Harris provides a timely inquiry into the role of content moderation in online platforms and the effects of different moderation policies on the ability of people using the platforms to understand the information they present and recognize misinformation . . . This book would be useful in a course on epistemology, communications, media theory, or the sociology of the internet. Summing Up: Recommended."
Choice Reviews
