Fr. 180.00

Teachers'' Unions and Education Reform in Comparative Contexts

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 1 to 3 weeks (not available at short notice)

Description

Read more










This volume considers the prevailing assumption that teachers' unions successfully block change in education because they are primarily motivated to protect members' interests. It challenges the conceptualization of teacher union motivation and provides a more nuanced account of unions' interests, power and impact. Through a series of international cases from the United States, Finland and the Canton of Zürich, it argues that a better understanding of the union-management relationship may be the key to securing more meaningful change and reform.


List of contents

Introduction PART ONE: RESEARCH DESIGN 1. Teachers’ Unions and Education Reform: A Review of the Literature 2. Beyond Narrow Assumptions of Interest and Power: A Conceptual Framework 3. Research Design, Case Selection, and Methodology PART TWO: INTERNATIONAL CASES 4. Finland: History and Context 5. Quiet Compromises: Finland’s New Salary System 6. The Canton of Zürich: History and Context 7. Eventually Overcoming Resistance: The MAB System 8. Finland and Zürich: Multiple Pathways to Reform PART THREE: SCHOOL DISTRICT CASES 9. Teachers’ Unions in the United States: A Sub-National Test 10. School District Analysis: A Series of Congruence Tests PART FOUR: CONCLUSION 11. Useful Conflict?: Finding the Path to Progress

About the author

Lindsay M. Whorton received her DPhil at the University of Oxford, UK and served as Legislative Director to Colorado Senator Mike Johnston. She lives in Washington DC.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.