Read more
In
Perfecting the Union, Max M. Edling focuses on the reform of the American Union brought about by the framing and adoption of the Constitution and the resulting division of duties and powers between the national government and the states. He argues that the Constitution profoundly altered the structure of the American Union and made the federal government more effective than under the defunct Articles of Confederation, but does not accept that federal power expanded at the expense of the states. He therefore offers a powerful new interpretation of the Constitution that has important implications for our understanding of the American founding.
List of contents
- Introduction: Revisiting the Critical Period
- Chapter One: Peace Pact and Nation, The Constitution as a Compact between States
- Chapter Two: Union, Empowering a New National Government
- Chapter Three: Internal Police, The Residual Power of the States
- Chapter Four: Legislation, Implementing the Constitution
- Conclusion: Toward a New Understanding of the Founding
- Notes
- Index
About the author
Max M. Edling is Reader in Early American History at the King's College, London. He is the author of A Revolution in Favor of Government: The Origin of the US Constitution and the Making of the American State and A Hercules in the Cradle: War, Money, and the American State, 1783-1867.
Summary
For most of the twentieth century, the American founding has been presented as a struggle between social classes over issues arising primarily within, rather than outside, the United States. But in recent years, new scholarship has instead turned to the international history of the American union to interpret both the causes and the consequences of the US Constitution.
In Perfecting the Union, Max M. Edling argues that the Constitution was created to defend US territorial integrity and the national interest from competitors in the western borderlands and on the Atlantic Ocean, and to defuse inter-state tension within the union. By replacing the defunct Articles of Confederation, the Constitution profoundly transformed the structure of the American union by making the national government more effective. But it did not transform the fundamental purpose of the union, which remained a political organization designed to manage inter-state and international relations. And in contrast to what many scholars claim, it was never meant to eclipse the state governments.
The Constitution created a national government but did not significantly extend its remit. The result was a dual structure of government, in which the federal government and the states were both essential to the people's welfare. Getting the story about the Constitution straight matters, Edling claims, because it makes possible a broader assessment of the American founding as both a transformative event, aiming at territorial and economic expansion, and as a conservative event, aiming at the preservation of key elements of the colonial socio-political order.
Additional text
In this bracing new study, historian Max Edling shows how the US Constitution was not intended primarily as a solution to internal problems within the states but as a means of addressing intractable problems between the states, with foreign nations, and with Native Americans in the west. Abandoning the stultifying dichotomy between 'progressive vs. conservative' that has constricted scholarly debate for decades, Edling restores the Constitution to its true historical context.
