Fr. 136.00

Choices in a Chaotic Campaign - Understanding Citizens'' Decisions in the 2020 Election

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 1 to 3 weeks (not available at short notice)

Description

Read more










"Examines the historic 2020 presidential election to explore citizens' dynamic responses to different elements of the campaign. Develops the citizen-centered theory of campaigns, arguing people's psychological predispositions and political predilections affect assessments of campaign events and issues, ultimately altering citizens' voting decisions"--

List of contents










1. Understanding how campaigns matter; 2. 'A hot mess inside a dumpster fire inside a train wreck': understanding the impact of the first presidential debate; 3. The priming of covid-19 during the campaign: the consequences of trump's coronavirus diagnosis; 4. The murder of George Floyd: how views of black lives matter and policing affected campaign 2020; 5. 'A rigged election': how views about election integrity altered the campaign; 6. How citizens impressions of the candidates influence vote choice; 7. The impact of campaign messages on the decision to vote; 8. How campaign 2020 matters.

About the author

Kim L. Fridkin is a Foundation Professor of Political Science at Arizona State University. With Patrick J. Kenney, she is the author of Taking Aim at Attack Advertising (2019) and The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of US Senators and Constituent Communications (2014).Patrick J. Kenney is Foundation Professor of Political Science and an Executive Vice Provost at Arizona State University. With Kim L. Fridkin, he is the author of Taking Aim at Attack Advertising (2019) and The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of US Senators and Constituent Communications (2014).

Summary

Examines the historic 2020 presidential election to explore citizens' dynamic responses to different elements of the campaign. Develops the citizen-centered theory of campaigns, arguing people's psychological predispositions and political predilections affect assessments of campaign events and issues, ultimately altering citizens' voting decisions.

Foreword

Psychological predispositions influence the assessment of political campaigns, including people's views of the 2020 presidential candidates.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.