Read more
This work deals with the possibility of the principle of insignificance being applied to crimes of abstract danger, taking as its theoretical basis the constitutional principles of the dignity of the human person, minimum intervention and offensiveness, as well as the modern conception of typicality in the material sense, going through the thesis of the disvalue of the result as the foundations of criminal injustice. The importance of the subject is emphasised by the growing proliferation of abstract danger crimes in today's risk society and their worrying reading in strictly formal terms, devoid of any material content. In this context, the aim of this work is to demonstrate the need to adapt the legislative technique of abstract danger crimes to constitutional dictates, by demanding a minimum level of harmful potentiality of the concrete conduct in relation to the legal asset that the legislator sought to protect, in order to confer legitimacy on criminal intervention, concluding that the application of the principle of insignificance is also compatible in the context of abstract danger crimes.
About the author
Dandara Freitas de Oliveira - Licenciada en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de São Paulo, Brasil.
