Read more
The US administration's pursuit of the Al-Qaeda organisation and Taliban rigime in Afghanistan, responsible for the September 11, 2001 international terrorist attacks, was supported by an international "coalition of the willing" and backed by the full legal authority of UN Security Council Resolutions.The US bid to follow this successful multilateral initiative with similar armed intervention against Saddam Hussein's government failed to rally support in the Security Council.The US then proceeded to act unilaterally, and with British military support, to invade Iraq.
The problems for contemporary international law and the UN Charter based World Order system posed by the conflicts within the Security Council and the assorted legal claims advanced, such as a revived doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention; "rigime change as a justification for intervention; Preemptive military strikes as an exercise in Self-defence; and Multilateralism versus Unilateralism in the exercise of the Peace and Security powers under the UN Charter, are canvassed in the present collection of legal opinions.
About the author
Edward McWhinney, Professor of International Law is Member and President (1999-2001) of the Institut de Droit International, sometime Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and sometime Member of Parliament and Parliamentary Secretary for Foreign Affairs (Canada). He is a Queen's Counsel and international legal Consultant and Adviser.
