Fr. 70.00

Applying Decision Research to Improve Clinical Outcomes, - Psychological Assessment, and Clinical Predictio

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










Mental health professionals often must make judgments or decisions involving vital matters. Is an individual likely to act violently? Has a child been sexually abused? Is a police officer fit to carry a gun? An explosion of research in clinical and cognitive psychology provides practical means for enhancing the accuracy of clinical decision making and prediction and thereby improving outcomes and the quality of care. Unfortunately, this research has not been broadly disseminated in the mental health field. The book is designed to familiarize readers with essential findings from decision science and its practical, immediate applications in the mental health field.

List of contents










  • Part I: Introduction and Foundations

  • Chapter 1 The Benefits of Decision Research for Clinical Practice: Framing the Issues

  • Chapter 2 Avoiding Unnecessary Error

  • Part II: Gathering, Appraising, and Integrating Information

  • Chapter 3 Assessing Whether Clinical Variables Are Related: The Important Task of Covariation Estimation

  • Chapter 4 Confirmation Bias

  • Chapter 5 Impediments to Accurate Decision Making

  • Chapter 6 Base Rates: One of the Diagnostician's and Prognosticator's Greatest Allies

  • Chapter 7 The Integration of Information: Strengths and Limits

  • Chapter 8 Comparing Clinical Judgment and Statistical Decision Methods

  • Chapter 9 Research on Racial/Ethnic Biases and Professional Judgment: Errors in Cold Cognition, Hot Cognition, and Interconnections with Decision Research

  • Chapter 10 The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Making: Current Status, Potential Advantages and Limits, Future Prospects

  • Part III: Corrective Methods and Strategies

  • Chapter 11 Overconfidence and the Limits of Experience

  • Chapter 12 The Limits of Insight Alone; Need for Active Steps, and Use of Debiasing Strategies

  • Chapter 13 Approaches for Improving Information Gathering, Appraising the Utility of Information, and Combining and Interpreting Information

  • Appendices

  • Appendix 1 A sampling of base rate sources

  • Appendix 2 Base rate nomogram

  • Appendix 3 Examples of combining base rates with other diagnostic signs, indicators, and test results

  • Appendix 4 A sampling of recent publications in five areas of machine learning and artificial intelligence related to applied clinical practice

  • Appendix 5 Practice Cases and Clinical Scenarios

  • Appendix 6 Checklists/Guidelines



About the author

David Faust, PhD is Professor, Department of Psychology and Fellow of the Ryan Institute of Neuroscience, University of Rhode Island; Affiliate Professor, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior

Hal R. Arkes, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology, Ohio State University; Associate, Harding Center for Risk Literacy

Charles E. Gaudet, PhD is Fellow, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Summary

Mental health professionals often make explicit or implicit predictions involving crucial matters--Is a client at risk for self-harm or harming others? What treatment approach is most likely to be successful? Has a child been subjected to sexual or physical abuse? Decision research has particularly strong applied use for improving the accuracy of such determinations; unfortunately this work has not been broadly disseminated in the mental health field.

Applying Decision Research to Improve Clinical Outcomes, Psychological Assessment, and Clinical Prediction introduces graduate students and practitioners in the mental health field to research, knowledge, and practical strategies that can enhance diagnostic and predictive accuracy and thereby improve client care. Major chapters of the book address well-established, but often under-recognized, principles and procedures for improving the integration of clinical data and interpretive accuracy; the differentiation between seemingly accurate but illusory, as opposed to genuine, associations between signs, symptoms, and outcomes; and the minimization of impediments to accurate decision making. The authors merge applied clinical tasks in the mental health field with decision research and cognitive psychology to suggest ways in which prediction, diagnosis, and assessment can be accomplished with greater efficacy and precision.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.