Read more
What happens to journalism when its credibility has been decimated and journalists no longer believe in themselves? Can the journalism field reinvigorate itself, either from within or with assistance from global journalism actors? This book examines journalism practice in Rwanda to draw conclusions applicable to journalism fields everywhere. Drawing on seven months of fieldwork, Ruth Moon argues that, not only is the force of globalization inadequate to shift practice in a local context, but it in fact serves to reinforce local practices and boundaries, highlighting the limits of globalization to effect change.
List of contents
- Introduction: Why Study Rwandan Journalism?
- Chapter One: On the Margins: Understanding Peripheral Journalism
- Chapter Two: Strong State, Weak Field: The Forces Shaping Journalism in Rwanda
- Chapter Three: Founding Myths: Stories as Building Blocks of Journalism Practice
- Chapter Four: Underbaked or Unrealized: "Underdevelopment" as a Journalistic Keyword
- Chapter Five: Money Matters: The News Values of Business Pressure
- Chapter Six: Bridging Worlds: Working Global While Living Local
- Conclusion: What is Weak Journalism Good For? The Power and Potential of Peripheral Practice
About the author
Ruth Moon (PhD, University of Washington) is an assistant professor of media and public affairs at Louisiana State University. She studies journalists and the constraints and incentives that shape their work with a focus on practice in the Global South. She has published research in Digital Journalism, Journalism Studies, Journalism, Information, Communication & Society, and International Journal of Communication. Her research is informed by more than 10 years' professional experience working as a reporter and editor for several magazines and newspapers in the U.S.
Summary
Journalists working in authoritarian countries contend with competing institutional logics. This is particularly the case in post-conflict countries, where journalistic practice is simultaneously shaped by historical antagonisms, global development initiatives, and the authoritarian state. While journalism schools and professional organizations speak a Western logic of objectivity and independence, political history instills a logic of subordination, and organizational business models instill a logic of financially motivated censorship. As more countries move away from democratic models, more and more journalists will face these seemingly irreconcilable pressures.
Building on months of ethnographic work, Ruth Moon looks at journalistic practice in Rwanda, a country where journalism has developed into a stable field in the two and a half decades since the nation's 1994 genocide. At the same time, its journalists, facing pressure to please the State, have lost confidence in themselves, and readers have lost faith in local media. Can the nation's news media reinvigorate itself, either from within or with assistance from global journalism actors? This book examines journalism practice in Rwanda to draw conclusions applicable to journalism fields everywhere. Moon argues that not only is the force of globalization inadequate to shift local practice, but it in fact serves to reinforce local practices and boundaries.
Additional text
A fascinating read that offers colorful, thick descriptions of the site that Moon studied, Authoritarian Journalism is a formidable addition to the research on news labor in the Global South.
