Read more
In
The Liberalism Trap, Menaka Philips identifies a methodological problem in contemporary political theory: preoccupations with liberalism have come to dominate the study of politics. To evaluate the effects of such preoccupations, Philips turns to John Stuart Mill--the so-called paradigmatic liberal. She shows not only that Mill's famed liberal status is habitually substituted for his political arguments, but also that this substitution obscures the role of uncertainty in Mill's political thought. Across his writings on women's emancipation, class reform, and British Empire, Philips recovers the uncertain strategies that inform Mill's politics, offering an innovative account that sets into relief the limits of reading through liberalism.
List of contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1: Is Liberalism Inescapable?
- 2: Disciplined by Liberalism: Contestations, Pedagogies, and the Exemplary Mr. Mill
- 3: Mill Reconsidered: From a Crisis of Certainty to a Politics of Uncertainty
- 4: The School of Virtues: Emancipating Women, Wives, and Mothers
- 5: Earning Democracy: Class Politics and the Public Trust
- 6: Governing Dependencies: Between Authority and Self-Determination
- 7: Politics, Possibility, and Risk: Beyond the Liberalism Trap
- Bibliography
- Index
About the author
Menaka Philips is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto. She writes on a range of issues in historical and contemporary political thought and has published in journals such as The American Political Science Review, European Journal of Political Theory, and Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
Summary
Arguments about liberalism's meanings, endurance, imminent death, or revival are widespread in modern political thought. But what effect do these preoccupations with liberalism have on the way political questions are taken up?
In The Liberalism Trap, Menaka Philips argues that the focus on liberalism has become a customary limit on our political imaginations. To examine the costs of that custom, Philips turns to John Stuart Mill-the so-called paradigmatic liberal. As she argues, Mill's famed liberal status is habitually substituted for his political arguments such that the now standard association of Mill with liberalism determines how and why he is read. Philips, however, takes a break from that ready association. Her comparative reading of Mill's work concerning women's emancipation, class reform, and the British Empire recovers a thinker guided not by the ideological certainties he is often made out to represent, but by a politics of uncertainty-a politics which generated radical, gradualist, and paternalist strategies throughout his proposals on domestic and imperial questions.
By reading Mill against the limits of liberalism, Philips draws out the possibilities and risks of Mill's own political practice, while inviting a critical evaluation of the customs of interpretation that shape contemporary political thought.
Additional text
skillfully brings out how qualified that support was and how Mill was committed to Indians' rights and their learning and culture.
