Fr. 236.00

Subject in Question - Sartre''s Critique of Husserl in the Transcendence of the Ego

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 1 to 3 weeks (not available at short notice)

Description

Read more

Informationen zum Autor Stephen Priest lectures in the Faculties of Philosophy and Theology in the University of Oxford. He is a fellow of Blackfriars Hall, Oxford and a member of Wolfson College, Oxford. Stephen Priest is the author of The British Empiricists, Theories of the Mind, Merleau-Ponty and The Subject in Question . He is the editor of Hegel's Critique of Kant and Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writings and co-editor (with Anthony Flew) of A Dictionary of Philosophy . Klappentext The Subject in Question provides a fascinating insight into a debate between two of the twentieth century's most famous philosophers - Jean-Paul Sartre and Edmund Husserl - over the key notions of conscious experience and the self. Sartre's The Transcendence of the Ego, published in 1937, is a major text in the phenomenological tradition and sets the course for much of his later work. The Subject in Question is the first full-length study of this famous work and its influence on twentieth-century philosophy. It also investigates the relationship between Sartre's ideas and the earlier work of Descartes and Kant. Zusammenfassung The Subject in Question provides a fascinating insight into a debate between two of the most famous contemporary philosophers - Jean-Paul Sartre and Edmund Husserl - over key notions of conscious experience and the self. Inhaltsverzeichnis Husserl and the Transcendental EgoThe I and the MeThe Theory of the Material Presence of the Me^l Conclusions

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.