Sold out

Why we Need Cusanus - Warum wir Cusanus brauchen

German · Book

Description

Read more

In the history of the scholarship on Nicholas of Cusa 1964 was a remarkable year. The fifth centenary of Cusanus's death was celebrated and two famous Conferences were held in Bernkastel-Kues and Brixen/Bressanone, Nicholas's German birthplace and episcopal see in South Tyrol, respectively. In the summer of the same year, the theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar published a long article in the cultural supplement of the Swiss newspaper "Basler Volksblattes" entitled: "Warum wir Cusanus brauchen". Almost sixty years after Balthasar's article, in this book philosophers, theologians and scholars from different European countries return to debate on the topicality of Cusanus's thought and its relevance for contemporary culture.The contributors to this volume address the question raised by Balthasar in 1964 ("Why we need Cusanus") from various perspectives and from different approaches. In this way, the studies collected here offer the reader a picture of the multiple legacies of Cusanus's philosophy and, at the same time, enable him to have a look at the new directions of research on Nicholas of Cusa and its developments in the last few decades.

Product details

Assisted by Maschini (Editor), Marco Maschini (Editor), Enrico Peroli (Editor)
Publisher Aschendorff Verlag
 
Languages German
Product format Book
Released 01.04.2022
 
EAN 9783402160213
ISBN 978-3-402-16021-3
No. of pages 283
Dimensions 166 mm x 19 mm x 230 mm
Weight 484 g
Series Texte und Studien zur Europäischen Geistesgeschichte, Reihe B
Subject Humanities, art, music > Religion/theology > Christianity

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.