Read more
Yegor Grebnev examines crucial noncanonical texts preserved in the
Yi Zhou shu (Neglected Zhou Scriptures) and the Grand Duke traditions. He develops an innovative framework for the study and interpretation of these texts, focusing on their role in the mediation of royal legitimacy and their formative impact on early Daoism.
List of contents
List of Illustrations
List of Tables
Acknowledgments
Chronology
Introduction
1. The Structure of the Yi Zhou shu and Its Formation History
2. Understanding Early Chinese Scriptures
3. Appropriated and Created Scriptures
4. Royal Colloquies as the Main Text Type in the Yi Zhou shu
5. Daoist Scriptures of the Grand Duke
6. Heirloom Treasures, Scriptures, and Legitimacy
Conclusion
Appendix 1. Scenic, Formalistic, and Alarming Contextual Settings
Appendix 2. Summary of the Zhou shu in the Shi lüe
Appendix 3. “Sequential Outline of the Zhou Scriptures”
Appendix 4. Permutations of the Chapter(s) “Shifa” (Order of Posthumous Names)
Notes
Bibliography
Index
About the author
Yegor Grebnev is an associate distinguished research fellow at Beijing Normal University (Zhuhai) and an assistant professor at BNU-HKBU United International College. He was a junior fellow at the Society of Fellows in the Liberal Arts at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen while this book was completed.
Summary
Scholarship on early China has traditionally focused on a core group of canonical texts. However, understudied sources have the potential to shift perspectives on fundamental aspects of Chinese intellectual, religious, and political history. Yegor Grebnev examines crucial noncanonical texts preserved in the Yi Zhou shu (Neglected Zhou Scriptures) and the Grand Duke traditions, which represent scriptural traditions influential during the Warring States period but sidelined in later history. He develops an innovative framework for the study and interpretation of these texts, focusing on their role in the mediation of royal legitimacy and their formative impact on early Daoism.
Grebnev demonstrates the centrality of the Yi Zhou shu in Chinese intellectual history by highlighting its simultaneous connections to canonical traditions and esoteric Daoism. He also shows that the Daoist rituals of textual transmission embedded in the Grand Duke traditions bear an imprint of the courtly environment of the Warring States period, where early Daoists strove for prestige and power, offering legitimacy through texts ascribed to the mythical sage rulers. These rituals appear to have emerged at the same period as the core Daoist philosophical texts and not several centuries later as conventionally believed, which calls for a reassessment of the history of Daoism’s interrelated religious and philosophical strands. Offering a far-reaching reconsideration of early Chinese intellectual and religious history, Mediation of Legitimacy in Early China sheds new light on the foundations of the Chinese textual tradition.
Additional text
Mediation of Legitimacy in Early China brings together two too often overlooked sources to make fresh observations concerning the structure of early Chinese texts, and what this structure shows about the process of their composition. It has far-reaching implications for understanding all aspects of the early Chinese literary tradition.
