Read more
In
Covering Muslims, Erik Bleich and A. Maurits van der Veen conclusively show that newspaper articles touching on Muslims are strikingly negative. They use cutting-edge techniques from computational social science to prove that articles that mention Muslims are far more negative than comparable stories related to Catholics, Jews, Hindus, African Americans, Latinos, Mormons, or atheists. The results examine how media outlets may contribute to pervasive Islamophobia, and encourages readers and journalists to "tone check" the media rather than simply accepting negative associations with Muslims or other marginalized groups.
List of contents
- Preface
- Chapter 1
- Media coverage of Muslims: Introduction and overview
- Chapter
- The tone of Muslim coverage
- Chapter 3
- United States newspaper coverage of Muslims: Main patterns and group comparisons
- Chapter
- Time and tone: Major events and their impact on coverage
- Chapter 5
- Is the United States unique?
- Examining newspapers from the Anglophone North and the Global South
- Chapter 6
- What do newspapers talk about when they talk about Muslims?
- Chapter 7
- Conclusions and extensions:
- Islamophobia, constructing boundaries, and tone-checking the media
- Appendix I
- I.A. Corpus creation
- I.B. Sentiment analysis
- I.C. Geocoding
- Appendix II
- II.2. Chapter 2-Supplementary material
- II.3. Chapter 3-Supplementary material
- II.4. Chapter 4-Supplementary material
- II.5. Chapter 5-Supplementary material
- II.6. Chapter 6-Supplementary material
- References
About the author
Erik Bleich is Charles A. Dana Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College. He is the author, editor, or co-editor of several books, including The Freedom to Be Racist? How the United States and Europe Struggle to Preserve Freedom and Combat Racism (Oxford University Press, 2011). His scholarship has appeared in journals in the fields of political science, communications, sociology, religion, and law, and he has contributed to public discussions in the Atlantic, Financial Times, The Guardian, and The Washington Post. He directs the Media Portrayals of Minorities Project, which uses computer-assisted techniques to analyze media representations of marginalized groups.
A. Maurits van der Veen is Associate Professor of Government at William & Mary. He is the author of Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid (2011), which examines the framing of spending on foreign populations by European politicians. His work has appeared in journals in political science,
communications, and religion, and has been discussed in media outlets such as The Washington Post. He directs the STAIR (Systematic Text Analysis for International Relations) lab at William & Mary, which develops and applies computational social science techniques for the analysis of large corpora of political texts.
Summary
An examination of how American newspaper articles on Muslims are strikingly negative by any measure.
For decades, scholars and observers have criticized negative media portrayals of Muslims and Islam. Yet most of these critiques are limited by their focus on one specific location, a limited time period, or a single outlet. In Covering Muslims, Erik Bleich and A. Maurits van der Veen present the first systematic, large-scale analysis of American newspaper coverage of Muslims through comparisons across groups, time, countries, and topics. The authors demonstrate conclusively that coverage of Muslims is remarkably negative by any measure. They show that American newspapers have been consistently negative across the two-decade period between 1996 and 2016 and that articles on Muslims are more negative than those touching on groups as diverse as Catholics, Jews, Hindus, African Americans, Latinos, Mormons, or atheists. Strikingly, even articles about mundane topics tend to be negative. The authors suggest that media outlets both within and outside the United States may contribute to pervasive Islamophobia and they encourage readers and journalists to "tone check" the media rather than simply accepting negative associations with Muslims or other marginalized groups.
Additional text
Extensive and significantly representative...journalists, editors, publishers, and those who train them (journalism and communication schools, religion departments, professional guilds) should take note.
