Fr. 54.50

Values in the Supreme Court - Decisions, Division and Diversity

English · Paperback / Softback

New edition in preparation, currently unavailable

Description

Read more

Informationen zum Autor Rachel Cahill-O'Callaghan is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Cardiff. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. A Theoretical Framework for a Role of Values in Judicial Decisions I. Judicial Discretion and the Exercise of Choice in Uncertain Decisions II. Defining Values III. A Foundation for the Role of Values, Uncertainty and Intuition in Judicial Decision Making IV. Evidence of Instinct and Values in the Supreme CourtV. Constraint on the Influence of Values 2. Finding Values in Legal Judgments: A Model and a Method I. A Psychological Model of Personal Values II. A Note on the Selection of Judgments: Hard Cases in the UK Supreme Court III. A Method to Identify Values in Legal Judgments IV. Values in Legal Judgments – Examples V. Limits of the Coding Scheme 3. The Value:Decision Paradigm: Validating the Method I. The Case – R (on the Application of E) v JFS Governing Body [2009] II. Are the Values Affirmed by Opposing Decisions Reflective of Intrinsic Personal Values? The Experiment 4. Does the Value:Decision Paradigm Apply to all Indeterminate Cases? Division, Dissent and Judicial Values I. Defining Dissent and Division II. Division in the UK Supreme Court III. What Motivates Dissent? IV. The Psychology of Dissent V. Case Selection and Analysis VI. Values in Cases which Divided Judicial Opinion VII. Values, Division and the Subject Matter of the Case VIII. The Value:Decision Paradigm in Cases with a Single Dissent IX. Concurring Judgments in Consensus Decisions – Another Form of Disagreement X. Division, Dissent, Uncertainty and Values 5. Values and Individual Decision Making: Diversity of Values and Consistency in Decisions I. The Role of the Individual in Judicial Decisions II. Individual Difference – Tacit Diversity in Judicial Decision Making III. Diversity of Values in the Supreme Court IV. Values Priorities Reflected in Judicial Decisions V. The Value:Decision Paradigm in Individual Legal Decision Making VI. Individual Values and Decisions 6. Values and Panel Decision Making: Shared Value Priorities and Agreement in Hard Cases I. Agreement in the UK Supreme CourtII. Calculating Agreement in the Supreme Court III. Shared Judicial Value Priorities IV. Values and Agreement in Cases which Divide Judicial Opinion V. Values and Agreement in the Supreme Court 7. The Role of Values in Judicial Decision Making in the UK Supreme Court I. Transparency II. Judicial Diversity III. Judicial Appointment...

Product details

Authors Rachel Cahill-O'Callaghan
Publisher Hart Publishing
 
Languages English
Product format Paperback / Softback
Released 26.08.2021
 
EAN 9781509954766
ISBN 978-1-5099-5476-6
No. of pages 232
Dimensions 154 mm x 234 mm x 16 mm
Series Hart Studies on Judging and the Courts
Subjects Social sciences, law, business > Law > International law, foreign law

LAW / Constitutional, LAW / Judicial Power, Judicial powers, Constitutional & administrative law, Constitutional and administrative law: general, Legal systems: judges and judicial powers

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.