Read more
These in-depth, historical, and critical essays study the meaning of ornament, the role it played in the formation of modernism, and its theoretical importance between the mid-nineteenth century and the late twentieth century in England and Germany. Ranging from Owen Jones to Ernst Gombrich through Gottfried Semper, Alois Riegl, August Schmarsow, Wilhelm Worringer, Adolf Loos, Henry van de Velde, and Hermann Muthesius, the contributors show how artistic theories are deeply related to the art practice of their own times, and how ornament is imbued with historical and social meaning.
List of contents
Table of Contents
List of Illustrations
Acknowledgments
Contributors's Biographies
Introduction
Chapter One
Owen Jones's Theory of Ornament
Isabelle J. Frank
Chapter Two
Function, Fiction, Flux and Silence:
Ornamental Theory, Science, and the Modern Search for Aesthetic Volition
Debra K. Schafter
Chapter Three
August Schmarsow's Theory of Ornament
Christiane Hertel
Chapter Four
The Veil of Truth?
Van de Velde, Muthesius, and the Battle over Ornament in Modern Architecture
Ole W. Fischer
Chapter Five
Ornament, Image, and Tension in Ernst Gombrich's Theory of PerceptionLoretta Vandi & Pavlos Jerenis
Bibliography
About the author
Loretta Vandi
(Ph.D., Université de Lausanne, 1998) is Professor of Art History at the Scuola del Libro in Urbino. She has held four Samuel H. Kress fellowships. Her publications include
La trasformazione del motivo dell'acanto dall'antichità al XV secolo (2002),
Il Manoscritto Oliveriano 1 (2004), and
Four Essays (2007).
Summary
These in-depth, historical, and critical essays study the meaning of ornament, the role it played in the formation of modernism, and its theoretical importance between the mid-nineteenth century and the late twentieth century in England and Germany. Ranging from Owen Jones to Ernst Gombrich through Gottfried Semper, Alois Riegl, August Schmarsow, Wilhelm Worringer, Adolf Loos, Henry van de Velde, and Hermann Muthesius, the contributors show how artistic theories are deeply related to the art practice of their own times, and how ornament is imbued with historical and social meaning.
Report
"This emphasis on the chronological margins of Modernism should not come as a surprise either, since Modernism and ornament are two notions that are often positioned in diametrically opposed way. The famous, but not always well read or contextualized slogan of Alfred Loos, 'Ornament is crime', is the best-known symptom of this antagonism, which the interesting collection edited by art historian Loretta Vandi aims to question. And it does so very successfully, thanks to the rich and sophisticated historical reconstruction and close-reading of many debates, publications, and realizations having to do with ornaments." --Leonardo
"[This book] offers an in-depth contribution to the theoretical interpretations of ornament and its role in the development of a crucial period in Western art and architecture. ... While some of the essays provide a deep contextual analysis, others are more focused on the discussion of specific and complex theoretical issues, but all of them share a common concern about the question of the dissociation between non-representational and representation art and the problem of the unity of art."
--Journal of Art Historiography
"These essays go beyond the question of whether their protagonists were for or against ornament in design and art; rather, they pursue questions of how these figures approached ornament in practice and theory and ask whether ornament was understood as valuable to cultural and artistic development or was regarded as reactionary and a hindrance to social reform. This detailed examination of the discussions and theories regarding ornament leads on to an analysis of the relationship of such debates to the creation of the modernist self-image (or images) of the European bourgeois man."
--The Burlington Magazine
"...the collection succeeds in tracing a trajectory that encourages a profound reconsideration of the role of ornamental theory in modernist thinking."
--Journal of Design History
